Suppr超能文献

医疗补助计划成员对产前护理提供模式创新的看法:未预约护理人群对孕妇发出的行动呼吁。

Medicaid member perspectives on innovation in prenatal care delivery: A call to action from pregnant people using unscheduled care.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, 850 Harrison Avenue, 5th Floor, Boston, MA 02118, USA; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.

Penn Center for Community Health Workers, 3801 Market Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

Healthc (Amst). 2020 Dec;8(4):100456. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100456. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-income women using prenatal care have shared concerns as well as unique needs not met by traditional prenatal care. Our objective was to explore user ideas on addressing unmet needs driving unscheduled care utilization and use findings to inform interventions to improve perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of qualitative interviews among purposively sampled, Medicaid-insured pregnant women with varied degrees of unscheduled care utilization. Interviews explored barriers and facilitators of health and ideas for improvement in care delivery, with a focus on the potential role of community health workers and social support. We extracted material on participants' perceived gaps and ideas, used modified grounded theory to develop general and subset themes by study group, and then mapped themes to potential intervention features.

RESULTS

We identified intervention targets in three thematic domains: social support, care delivery, and access, noting sub-group differences. Participants with four or more unscheduled visits during pregnancy ("Group 1") wanted individualized help navigating resources, coaching, and peer support, while participants with a first unscheduled care visit after 36 weeks of pregnancy ("Group 2) wanted these services to be optional. Group 1 participants wanted flexible appointments, less wait time, discharge education and improved communication with providers, while Group 2 participants sought stable insurance coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest acceptable approaches to improve social support, care delivery, and access via stratified, targeted interventions.

IMPLICATIONS

Targeted interventions to improve prenatal care that incorporate user ideas and address unique unmet needs of specific subgroups may improve perinatal outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

使用产前护理的低收入妇女既有共同的关注点,也有传统产前护理无法满足的独特需求。我们的目标是探讨满足未满足需求的方法,这些需求推动了非计划性护理的利用,并利用研究结果为改善围产期结局提供信息。

方法

我们对有不同程度非计划性护理利用的、有选择地抽取的、有医疗补助保险的孕妇进行了定性访谈的二次分析。访谈探讨了健康的障碍和促进因素,以及改善护理提供的想法,重点关注社区卫生工作者和社会支持的潜在作用。我们提取了关于参与者感知差距和想法的材料,使用改良的扎根理论通过研究组发展一般和子集主题,然后将主题映射到潜在的干预特征上。

结果

我们确定了三个主题领域的干预目标:社会支持、护理提供和获得,同时注意到亚组的差异。在怀孕期间有四次或更多非计划性就诊的参与者(“组 1”)希望获得个性化的资源导航帮助、辅导和同伴支持,而在怀孕 36 周后第一次非计划性护理就诊的参与者(“组 2”)希望这些服务是可选的。组 1 的参与者希望有灵活的预约、更少的等待时间、出院教育和与提供者的沟通改善,而组 2 的参与者则寻求稳定的保险覆盖。

结论

研究结果表明,通过分层、有针对性的干预措施,可以接受改善社会支持、护理提供和获得的方法。

意义

纳入用户想法并解决特定亚组独特未满足需求的、旨在改善产前护理的针对性干预措施可能会改善围产期结局。

证据水平

III。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验