Suppr超能文献

通过胰蛋白酶处理的膜进行电印迹,用于对电泳凝胶中分离的蛋白质进行液相色谱-串联质谱分析。

Electroblotting through a tryptic membrane for LC-MS/MS analysis of proteins separated in electrophoretic gels.

作者信息

Bickner A N, Champion M M, Hummon A B, Bruening M L

机构信息

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA.

出版信息

Analyst. 2020 Nov 23;145(23):7724-7735. doi: 10.1039/d0an01380c.

Abstract

Digestion of proteins separated via sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) remains a popular method for protein identification using mass-spectrometry based proteomics. Although robust and routine, the in-gel digestion procedure is laborious and time-consuming. Electroblotting to a capture membrane prior to digestion reduces preparation steps but requires on-membrane digestion that yields fewer peptides than in-gel digestion. This paper develops direct electroblotting through a trypsin-containing membrane to a capture membrane to simplify extraction and digestion of proteins separated by SDS-PAGE. Subsequent liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) identifies the extracted peptides. Analysis of peptides from different capture membrane pieces shows that electrodigestion does not greatly disturb the spatial resolution of a standard protein mixture separated by SDS-PAGE. Electrodigestion of an Escherichia coli (E. coli) cell lysate requires four hours of total sample preparation and results in only 13% fewer protein identifications than in-gel digestion, which can take 24 h. Compared to simple electroblotting and protein digestion on a poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVDF) capture membrane, adding a trypsin membrane to the electroblot increases the number of protein identifications by 22%. Additionally, electrodigestion experiments using capture membranes coated with polyelectrolyte layers identify a higher fraction of small proteolytic peptides than capture on PVDF or in-gel digestion.

摘要

通过十二烷基硫酸钠聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE)分离的蛋白质进行消化,仍然是基于质谱的蛋白质组学用于蛋白质鉴定的常用方法。尽管凝胶内消化程序稳健且常规,但却费力又耗时。在消化前将蛋白质电转印到捕获膜上可减少制备步骤,但需要在膜上进行消化,其产生的肽比凝胶内消化少。本文开发了一种通过含胰蛋白酶的膜直接电转印到捕获膜上的方法,以简化通过SDS-PAGE分离的蛋白质的提取和消化过程。随后的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)用于鉴定提取的肽。对来自不同捕获膜片的肽进行分析表明,电消化不会严重干扰通过SDS-PAGE分离的标准蛋白质混合物的空间分辨率。对大肠杆菌细胞裂解物进行电消化总共需要4小时的样品制备,与可能需要24小时的凝胶内消化相比,蛋白质鉴定结果仅少13%。与在聚偏二氟乙烯(PVDF)捕获膜上进行简单的电转印和蛋白质消化相比,在电转印过程中添加胰蛋白酶膜可使蛋白质鉴定数量增加22%。此外,使用涂有聚电解质层的捕获膜进行电消化实验,与在PVDF上捕获或凝胶内消化相比,能鉴定出更高比例的小蛋白水解肽。

相似文献

2
High yield electroblotting onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes from polyacrylamide gels.
Electrophoresis. 1992 Jan-Feb;13(1-2):59-64. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150130112.
4
Tube-gel digestion: a novel proteomic approach for high throughput analysis of membrane proteins.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005 Dec;4(12):1948-58. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500138-MCP200. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
6
Beneficial effects of Coomassie staining on proteomic analysis employing PAGE separation followed with whole-gel slicing, in-gel digestion and quantitative LC-MS/MS.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2019 Mar 15;1110-1111:25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.01.031. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
7
Rapid identification of comigrating gel-isolated proteins by ion trap-mass spectrometry.
Electrophoresis. 1998 May;19(6):968-80. doi: 10.1002/elps.1150190612.

本文引用的文献

2
Gel-based proteomics in disease research: Is it still valuable?
Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2019 Jan;1867(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
3
Global quantification of phosphoproteins combining metabolic labeling and gel-based proteomics in B. pumilus.
Electrophoresis. 2018 Jan;39(2):334-343. doi: 10.1002/elps.201700220. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
4
Mass spectrometry-assisted gel-based proteomics in cancer biomarker discovery: approaches and application.
Theranostics. 2017 Aug 18;7(14):3559-3572. doi: 10.7150/thno.20797. eCollection 2017.
5
Top-down/Bottom-up Mass Spectrometry Workflow Using Dissolvable Polyacrylamide Gels.
Anal Chem. 2017 Aug 15;89(16):8244-8250. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00357. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
6
Limited proteolysis in porous membrane reactors containing immobilized trypsin.
Analyst. 2017 Jul 10;142(14):2578-2586. doi: 10.1039/c7an00778g.
7
MALDI versus ESI: The Impact of the Ion Source on Peptide Identification.
J Proteome Res. 2017 Mar 3;16(3):1207-1215. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00805. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
8
Proteome analysis of excretory-secretory proteins of HM1:IMSS via LC-ESI-MS/MS and LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF.
Clin Proteomics. 2016 Nov 22;13:33. doi: 10.1186/s12014-016-9135-8. eCollection 2016.
9
The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics.
Nat Protoc. 2016 Dec;11(12):2301-2319. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.136. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验