Suppr超能文献

没有证据表明快速适应会阻碍对入侵植物的生物防治。

No evidence that rapid adaptation impedes biological control of an invasive plant.

作者信息

Stastny M, Russell-Mercier J L, Sargent R D

机构信息

Department of Biology University of Ottawa Ottawa ON Canada.

出版信息

Evol Appl. 2020 Aug 18;13(9):2472-2483. doi: 10.1111/eva.13053. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Biological control is a popular tool for invasive species management, but its success in nature is difficult to predict. One risk is that invasive plants, which may have adapted to lower herbivore pressure in the introduced range, could rapidly evolve defences upon re-association with their biocontrol agent(s). Previous studies have demonstrated that populations of the invasive plant purple loosestrife () exposed to biocontrol exhibit traits consistent with the rapid evolution of defence. However, to date, no one has tested this hypothesis under field-natural levels of herbivory. Using seed from 17 populations of purple loosestrife growing in eastern Canada, that varied in their history of exposure to their biocontrol agent, the leaf beetle spp., we transplanted 1,088 seedlings from 136 maternal families into a common garden under ambient herbivory. Over the following three and half years, we assessed plant performance in the face of biocontrol by measuring early-season plant size, defoliation, flowering, and season-end biomass. We discovered that a population history with biocontrol explained little variation in herbivory or plant performance, suggesting that adaptation is not hindering biocontrol effectiveness. Instead, plant size, subsequent defoliation, and spatio-temporal variables were the main predictors of plant growth and flowering during the study. The high individual variability we observed in plant performance underscores that flexible strategies of allocation and phenology are important contributors to the persistence of invasive plants. Our findings suggest that plant adaptation to biocontrol is unlikely to be a strong impediment to biological control in this species, however, the high survival and variable defoliation of plants in our study also indicate that biocontrol alone is unlikely to result in significant population decline. We recommend that the application of multiple forms of control simultaneously (e.g. thinning plus biocontrol) could help to prevent the existence of refuges of large, reproductive individuals.

摘要

生物防治是管理入侵物种的常用手段,但其在自然界中的成效难以预测。一种风险是,入侵植物在引入地可能已适应较低的食草动物压力,一旦与生物防治剂重新接触,可能会迅速进化出防御机制。此前的研究表明,接触生物防治的入侵植物紫千屈菜种群表现出与防御快速进化一致的特征。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究在野外自然食草水平下验证这一假设。我们利用来自加拿大东部17个紫千屈菜种群的种子,这些种群接触其生物防治剂叶甲的历史各不相同,从136个母系家族中选取1088株幼苗,在自然食草环境下移植到一个共同园圃中。在接下来的三年半时间里,我们通过测量季初植株大小、叶片被食情况、开花情况和季末生物量,评估了面对生物防治时植株的表现。我们发现,有生物防治历史的种群在食草情况或植株表现方面差异不大,这表明适应过程并未阻碍生物防治的效果。相反,植株大小、随后的叶片被食情况以及时空变量是研究期间植株生长和开花的主要预测因素。我们在植株表现中观察到的高个体变异性强调,灵活的分配策略和物候策略是入侵植物持续生存的重要因素。我们的研究结果表明,该物种中植物适应生物防治不太可能对生物防治构成强大阻碍,然而,我们研究中植株的高存活率和可变的叶片被食情况也表明,仅靠生物防治不太可能导致种群显著减少。我们建议同时应用多种防治形式(如间伐加生物防治),有助于防止出现大型繁殖个体的避难所。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba3/7513728/1a387d15f91a/EVA-13-2472-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验