Charles Nicolle Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Tunis, Tunisia.
Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University Tunis el Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Rom J Intern Med. 2021 Mar 5;59(1):58-65. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2020-0028. Print 2021 Mar 1.
. The objective of our present study is to assess the relation between persistent fatigue and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and its functional impact and to determine if the positive effect of biologics on fatigue is due to good disease response or to a different pathway.. A study cohort of patients with established RA was conducted. We included patients who had been prescried a biologic after at least failure of one conventional synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug synthetic (csDMARDs). At baseline, patients had a moderately to highly active disease. Demographic characteristics, disease activity and functional impact were assessed by disease activity score (DAS28CRP) and health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) scores. Fatigue was evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale questionnaire (FACIT-F). Patients were examined before initiating biotherapy, then after three months and six months.. Thirty women with RA, with a mean age of 52.5 years, were included. At baseline, 57% received anti-TNFα: Etanercept (n = 9), Adalimumab (n = 6), Infliximab (n = 2) and 43% received Rituximab. Good Eular response was obtained in 80% of patients at the third month and 97% of patients at the sixth month. In the analytic study, a significant amelioration after 3 months of biotherapy was found in both disease response (DAS28CRP) and fatigue (FACIT-F), respectively (p = 0.01, p<0.001 and p<0.001). The disease activity decreased significantly also after sixth month (p = 0.01, p<0.001 and p = 0.012). In the linear multivariate analysis, the regression of visual analogic pain (VAS pain) was the only predictors of the improvement of fatigue.. Biologics contribute to improve fatigue in patients with established RA and this effect seems to be independent from the clinical efficacy of this treatment.
. 本研究旨在评估持续性疲劳与类风湿关节炎(RA)疾病活动及其功能影响之间的关系,并确定生物制剂对疲劳的积极影响是否归因于良好的疾病反应,还是由于不同的途径。.. 我们进行了一项 RA 患者的研究队列。我们纳入了至少在使用一种传统合成疾病缓解抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)失败后接受生物制剂治疗的患者。基线时,患者的疾病处于中度至高度活动期。通过疾病活动评分(DAS28CRP)和健康评估问卷(HAQ)评分评估人口统计学特征、疾病活动和功能影响。疲劳通过慢性疾病治疗疲劳功能评估量表问卷(FACIT-F)进行评估。患者在开始生物治疗前、治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月时进行检查。.. 30 名女性 RA 患者,平均年龄 52.5 岁。基线时,57%的患者接受抗 TNFα 治疗:依那西普(n=9)、阿达木单抗(n=6)、英夫利昔单抗(n=2),43%的患者接受利妥昔单抗。第 3 个月时,80%的患者获得了良好的 EULAR 反应,第 6 个月时,97%的患者获得了良好的 EULAR 反应。在分析性研究中,生物治疗 3 个月后,疾病反应(DAS28CRP)和疲劳(FACIT-F)均显著改善(p=0.01,p<0.001 和 p<0.001)。第 6 个月后,疾病活动度也显著下降(p=0.01,p<0.001 和 p=0.012)。在多元线性分析中,视觉模拟疼痛(VAS 疼痛)的回归是疲劳改善的唯一预测因素。.. 生物制剂有助于改善 RA 患者的疲劳,这种效果似乎独立于这种治疗的临床疗效。