Sullivan University, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Louisville, Kentucky.
Associate Editor, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7827. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7827.
To compare Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment (PCOA) scaled scores and North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) pass rates in students who completed a two-week intersession remediation or repeated a course with the scaled scores and pass rates of students who did not require any form of didactic remediation and did not have to repeat a course. Data examined for this study included NAPLEX/PCOA scores, NAPLEX pass/fail status, and remediation history for students at one college of pharmacy. Students from the graduating classes of 2016, 2017, and 2018 were organized into four groups: non-remediation, one course remediation and no repeats, more than one course remediation and no repeats, and one or more course repeats. Differences were analyzed using linear regression, logistic regression, and Pearson correlations. The PCOA scores for students in the remediation groups were significantly lower than scores for students in the non-remediation groups, with a reduction of 37.8 to 50.9 points from the expected non-remediators' score. The NAPLEX scores for students who remediated more than one course or repeated one or more courses were 16-20 points lower compared to students who did not remediate. The likelihood of a student failing the NAPLEX was also not significantly lower for students who remediated one course but was significantly lower for other remediation groups. Although single course remediation in this curricular model appears to have minimal impact on NAPLEX outcomes and may be an acceptable intervention for many students, additional support and interventions may be warranted for students who qualify for remediation in multiple courses and/or for repeating a course.
将比较完成两周间隔辅导或重复课程的学生与不需要任何形式的教学辅导且无需重复课程的学生的药学课程成果评估 (PCOA) 量表评分和北美药剂师执照考试 (NAPLEX) 通过率。本研究的数据包括一所药学院学生的 NAPLEX/PCOA 分数、NAPLEX 通过/失败状态和辅导记录。将 2016、2017 和 2018 届毕业生分为四组:无辅导、一门课程辅导且无重复、多门课程辅导且无重复以及一门或多门课程重复。使用线性回归、逻辑回归和 Pearson 相关分析进行差异分析。辅导组学生的 PCOA 评分明显低于无辅导组学生的评分,与非辅导组学生的预期分数相比,降低了 37.8 至 50.9 分。辅导超过一门课程或重复一门或多门课程的学生的 NAPLEX 分数比未辅导的学生低 16-20 分。对于仅辅导一门课程的学生,他们未能通过 NAPLEX 的可能性也没有明显降低,但对于其他辅导组的学生,则明显降低。尽管在这种课程模式中单门课程辅导似乎对 NAPLEX 结果的影响很小,并且可能对许多学生是可以接受的干预措施,但对于符合多门课程辅导和/或重复课程条件的学生,可能需要额外的支持和干预措施。