• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of Intersession Course Remediation on NAPLEX/PCOA Scores in an Accelerated Doctor of Pharmacy Program.在加速药学博士课程中,课间课程补救对 NAPLEX/PCOA 分数的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7827. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7827.
2
Frequency of Course Remediation and the Effect on North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination Pass Rates.课程重修频率与北美药剂师执照考试通过率的关系。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Mar;87(2):ajpe8894. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8894. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
The impact of pharmacy students' remediation status on NAPLEX first-time pass rates.药学学生补救状态对 NAPLEX 首次通过率的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Dec 12;76(10):191. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7610191.
4
Comparing Student Performance on the Old vs New Versions of the NAPLEX.新旧版 NAPLEX 考试学生表现比较。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Apr;82(3):6408. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6408.
5
An analysis of the use of Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment (PCOA) scores within one professional program.对一个专业项目中药学课程成果评估(PCOA)分数使用情况的分析。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Mar-Apr;9(2):178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.11.008. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
6
A Study of the Relationship Between the PCOA and NAPLEX Using a Multi-institutional Sample.多机构样本研究 PCOA 与 NAPLEX 之间的关系。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Mar;83(2):6867. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6867.
7
Assessing the Relationship Between Didactic Performance and Standardized Examination Scores in Pharmacy Students.评估药学学生的教学表现与标准化考试成绩之间的关系。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Aug;84(8):ajpe847712. doi: 10.5688/ajpe847712.
8
Correlation of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment and Selected Pre-pharmacy and Pharmacy Performance Variables.药学课程成果评估与药学预科和药学表现相关变量的相关性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Apr;83(3):6579. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6579.
9
Utilization of active learning approaches in medicinal chemistry and subsequent correlations with North American Licensure Examination and Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment scores.在药物化学中运用主动学习方法及其与北美执照考试和药学课程成果评估分数的相关性。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Apr;13(4):376-381. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
A model to predict NAPLEX outcomes and identify students needing additional preparation.一个预测北美执业药师执照考试(NAPLEX)结果并识别需要额外准备的学生的模型。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Aug;11(8):810-817. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of Course Remediation and the Effect on North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination Pass Rates.课程重修频率与北美药剂师执照考试通过率的关系。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Mar;87(2):ajpe8894. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8894. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Associated with Student Pharmacists' Academic Progression and Performance on the National Licensure Examination.与学生药剂师学业进步和国家执照考试表现相关的因素。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Feb;84(2):7561. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7561.
2
Intersession Remediation to Minimize Attrition in a Three-Year Pharmacy Program.三年制药学项目中的课间补救以尽量减少流失。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Nov;83(9):7326. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7326.
3
To accept or decline academic remediation: What difference does it make?接受或拒绝学业辅导:有什么区别?
Med Teach. 2019 Jul;41(7):824-829. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1585789. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
Evaluation of student factors associated with pre-NAPLEX scores.评估与NAPLEX预考分数相关的学生因素。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Dec 15;78(10):181. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7810181.
5
Academic progression and retention policies of colleges and schools of pharmacy.药学学院和学校的学术进步和保留政策。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Mar 12;77(2):25. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77225.
6
The remediation challenge: theoretical and methodological insights from a systematic review.修复挑战:系统评价的理论和方法学见解。
Med Educ. 2013 Mar;47(3):242-51. doi: 10.1111/medu.12052.
7
The impact of pharmacy students' remediation status on NAPLEX first-time pass rates.药学学生补救状态对 NAPLEX 首次通过率的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Dec 12;76(10):191. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7610191.
8
A review of remediation programs in pharmacy and other health professions.药学和其他健康专业补救方案综述。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Mar 10;74(2):25. doi: 10.5688/aj740225.

在加速药学博士课程中,课间课程补救对 NAPLEX/PCOA 分数的影响。

Impact of Intersession Course Remediation on NAPLEX/PCOA Scores in an Accelerated Doctor of Pharmacy Program.

机构信息

Sullivan University, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Louisville, Kentucky.

Associate Editor, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Arlington, Virginia.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7827. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7827.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe7827
PMID:33012794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7523662/
Abstract

To compare Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment (PCOA) scaled scores and North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) pass rates in students who completed a two-week intersession remediation or repeated a course with the scaled scores and pass rates of students who did not require any form of didactic remediation and did not have to repeat a course. Data examined for this study included NAPLEX/PCOA scores, NAPLEX pass/fail status, and remediation history for students at one college of pharmacy. Students from the graduating classes of 2016, 2017, and 2018 were organized into four groups: non-remediation, one course remediation and no repeats, more than one course remediation and no repeats, and one or more course repeats. Differences were analyzed using linear regression, logistic regression, and Pearson correlations. The PCOA scores for students in the remediation groups were significantly lower than scores for students in the non-remediation groups, with a reduction of 37.8 to 50.9 points from the expected non-remediators' score. The NAPLEX scores for students who remediated more than one course or repeated one or more courses were 16-20 points lower compared to students who did not remediate. The likelihood of a student failing the NAPLEX was also not significantly lower for students who remediated one course but was significantly lower for other remediation groups. Although single course remediation in this curricular model appears to have minimal impact on NAPLEX outcomes and may be an acceptable intervention for many students, additional support and interventions may be warranted for students who qualify for remediation in multiple courses and/or for repeating a course.

摘要

将比较完成两周间隔辅导或重复课程的学生与不需要任何形式的教学辅导且无需重复课程的学生的药学课程成果评估 (PCOA) 量表评分和北美药剂师执照考试 (NAPLEX) 通过率。本研究的数据包括一所药学院学生的 NAPLEX/PCOA 分数、NAPLEX 通过/失败状态和辅导记录。将 2016、2017 和 2018 届毕业生分为四组:无辅导、一门课程辅导且无重复、多门课程辅导且无重复以及一门或多门课程重复。使用线性回归、逻辑回归和 Pearson 相关分析进行差异分析。辅导组学生的 PCOA 评分明显低于无辅导组学生的评分,与非辅导组学生的预期分数相比,降低了 37.8 至 50.9 分。辅导超过一门课程或重复一门或多门课程的学生的 NAPLEX 分数比未辅导的学生低 16-20 分。对于仅辅导一门课程的学生,他们未能通过 NAPLEX 的可能性也没有明显降低,但对于其他辅导组的学生,则明显降低。尽管在这种课程模式中单门课程辅导似乎对 NAPLEX 结果的影响很小,并且可能对许多学生是可以接受的干预措施,但对于符合多门课程辅导和/或重复课程条件的学生,可能需要额外的支持和干预措施。