Holmgren Sara, D'Amato Dalia, Giurca Alexandru
Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulls väg 27, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Ambio. 2020 Dec;49(12):1860-1877. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01398-6. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
This review article examines how social science literature co-produces various imaginaries of forest-based bioeconomy transformations and pathways for reaching desired ends. Based on an analysis of 59 research articles, we find that despite a growing number of social sciences studies on the forest-based bioeconomy, much of the research tends to replicate a bioeconomy imaginary articulated in EU and national bioeconomy policies and strategies. Accordingly, the research primarily reproduces a weak approach to sustainability, which prioritize economic growth and competitiveness. Expectations are largely directed at national and regional corporate interests and forest industrial renewal, while the state has a supportive rather than restricting role. We discuss the findings against the role of social sciences, and conclude that social science scholars may adopt various strategies if interested in opening up forest-based policy debates and offer alternative imaginaries of sustainable bioeconomy transformations.
这篇综述文章探讨了社会科学文献如何共同塑造基于森林的生物经济转型的各种想象以及实现预期目标的途径。基于对59篇研究文章的分析,我们发现,尽管关于基于森林的生物经济的社会科学研究数量不断增加,但许多研究往往复制了欧盟及国家生物经济政策和战略中阐述的生物经济想象。因此,该研究主要再现了一种对可持续性的薄弱方法,这种方法将经济增长和竞争力置于优先地位。期望主要指向国家和地区的企业利益以及森林产业的复兴,而国家扮演的是支持而非限制的角色。我们结合社会科学的作用讨论了这些发现,并得出结论:如果社会科学学者有兴趣开启基于森林的政策辩论并提供可持续生物经济转型的替代想象,他们可能会采取各种策略。