School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Sunderland Eye Infirmary, Sunderland, United Kingdom.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Jul;5(7):680-686. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
Determining which factors influence idiopathic macular hole (MH) size is important because it is a major prognostic indicator of treatment success. Foveal pit morphologic features are highly symmetrical within individuals and may influence idiopathic MH size. Using a series of patients with unilateral idiopathic MHs, we examined the foveal floor size of the fellow eye to evaluate its relationship with idiopathic MH size and postoperative outcomes.
Retrospective observational study.
Two hundred forty-one participants with a unilateral idiopathic MH treated with surgery and a fellow eye with no ocular pathologic features.
Both eyes underwent spectral-domain (SD) OCT imaging at the time of surgery. Minimum linear diameter (MLD) and base diameter (BD) defined idiopathic MH size. Foveal floor width (FFW) and minimal foveal thickness defined foveal pit morphologic features of the fellow eye.
Baseline characteristics, SD OCT measurements, and preoperative variables were compared to determine their relationship with idiopathic MH size and postoperative visual acuity (VA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units.
Foveal floor width was correlated with MLD (r = 0.36; P ≤ 0.001) and BD (r = 0.30; P ≤ 0.001), but not postoperative VA. Minimum linear diameter correlated with preoperative VA (r = 0.49; P ≤ 0.0001) and postoperative VA (r = 0.54; P ≤ 0.0001). A 2-stage regression model was developed to predict postoperative VA (r = 0.28): preoperative VA (β = 0.36; P = 0.002) explained 13% of variability and MLD (β = 0.29; P = 0.002), and idiopathic MH duration (β = 0.23; P = 0.004) explained a further 16%.
Foveal floor width of the fellow eye in patients with a unilateral idiopathic MH was correlated significantly with idiopathic MH size and may explain some of the variability in idiopathic MH size observed between individuals. However, FFW could not predict postoperative vision.
确定影响特发性黄斑裂孔(MH)大小的因素很重要,因为它是治疗成功的主要预后指标。在个体中,中心凹小凹的形态特征高度对称,可能会影响特发性 MH 的大小。本研究使用一系列单侧特发性 MH 患者,通过对其对侧眼的中心凹底部大小进行检查,来评估其与特发性 MH 大小和术后结果的关系。
回顾性观察性研究。
241 例接受单侧特发性 MH 手术治疗且对侧眼无眼部病理特征的患者。
所有患者双眼均在手术时行频域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)检查。最小线性直径(MLD)和基底直径(BD)定义特发性 MH 大小。中心凹底部宽度(FFW)和最小中心凹厚度定义对侧眼中心凹小凹形态特征。
比较基线特征、SD-OCT 测量值和术前变量,以确定它们与特发性 MH 大小和术后以最小角分辨率单位表示的视力(VA)的关系。
中心凹底部宽度与 MLD(r=0.36;P≤0.001)和 BD(r=0.30;P≤0.001)相关,但与术后 VA 无关。MLD 与术前 VA(r=0.49;P≤0.0001)和术后 VA(r=0.54;P≤0.0001)相关。建立了一个两阶段回归模型来预测术后 VA(r=0.28):术前 VA(β=0.36;P=0.002)解释了 13%的变异性,MLD(β=0.29;P=0.002)和特发性 MH 持续时间(β=0.23;P=0.004)进一步解释了 16%的变异性。
单侧特发性 MH 患者对侧眼的中心凹底部宽度与特发性 MH 大小显著相关,可能解释了个体间观察到的特发性 MH 大小的部分变异性。然而,FFW 无法预测术后视力。