Suppr超能文献

对全军所有医疗设施中的减重手术进行评估。

An evaluation of bariatric surgery in all military treatment facilities.

机构信息

Dwight D Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 300 E. Hospital Rd, Fort Gordon, GA, 30905, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5810-5815. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08079-1. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple bariatric databases have been formed, but there have been no comprehensive assessments of military treatment facilities (MTFs). MTFs have unique patients and coverage policies by Tricare insurance.

METHODS

MHS Mart (M2) was used to review the outpatient medical record, AHLTA, from October 2013 to December 2018 for type of bariatric procedure, demographics, military-specific data, comorbidities, and complications, which were identified by ICD code and CPT code, including a robotic modifier. MTFs were classified by volume as high (HV) with > 50 cases annually, moderate (MV) with 25 to 50 cases, and low (LV) with < 25 cases, as well as by the presence of surgical residencies.

RESULTS

Patients at MTFs were slightly younger and more female than by other database studies. The Army was the most common branch of service, and dependents of retirees were the most common beneficiary population. MTFs with residencies had slightly older patients and fewer Army patients. HV, MV, and LV MTFs had similar patients except for branch of service. Over time, the proportion of open gastric bypasses increased, biliopancreatic diversions with duodenal switches decreased, and robotic assistance increased 744%. MTFs with residencies performed more procedures than those without residencies, and with the exception of procedures utilizing robotic assistance, procedures were overall similar to those without residencies. HV MTFs performed most of the procedures annually, and their procedures were proportionately similar to MV and LV MTFs, with the exception of HV MTFs having a higher proportion of laparoscopic bypasses and robotic assistance.

CONCLUSION

MTFs largely perform similar procedures on similar patients relative to MBSAQIP and NSQIP studies. Robotic assistance increased significantly over time. Except for laparoscopic bypasses and procedures with robotic assistance, HV MTFs performed similar proportions of procedures to MV and LV MTFs. MTFs with residencies performed similar procedures to those without residencies.

摘要

背景

已经形成了多个减重数据库,但还没有对军事治疗设施(MTF)进行全面评估。MTF 具有独特的患者和 Tricare 保险覆盖政策。

方法

使用 MHS Mart(M2)审查了 2013 年 10 月至 2018 年 12 月的门诊病历、AHLTA,以了解减重手术类型、人口统计学、军事特定数据、合并症和并发症,这些信息通过 ICD 代码和 CPT 代码(包括机器人修饰符)确定。MTF 根据手术量分为高(HV)组(每年>50 例)、中(MV)组(25-50 例)和低(LV)组(<25 例),以及是否存在外科住院医师。

结果

MTF 患者比其他数据库研究中的患者略年轻且女性更多。陆军是最常见的军种,退休人员的家属是最常见的受益人群。有住院医师的 MTF 患者年龄稍大,陆军患者较少。HV、MV 和 LV MTF 患者除了军种外,其他方面都相似。随着时间的推移,开放式胃旁路术的比例增加,胆胰分流加十二指肠转位术减少,机器人辅助手术增加了 744%。有住院医师的 MTF 比没有住院医师的 MTF 实施的手术更多,除了使用机器人辅助的手术外,手术总体上与没有住院医师的 MTF 相似。HV MTF 每年实施的手术最多,其手术比例与 MV 和 LV MTF 相似,除了 HV MTF 腹腔镜旁路术和机器人辅助手术的比例较高外。

结论

与 MBSAQIP 和 NSQIP 研究相比,MTF 主要对类似患者进行类似的手术。机器人辅助手术的比例随着时间的推移显著增加。除了腹腔镜旁路术和使用机器人辅助的手术外,HV MTF 实施的手术比例与 MV 和 LV MTF 相似。有住院医师的 MTF 与没有住院医师的 MTF 实施的手术相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验