Radi Blas
Assistant Professor, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1824318. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1824318.
This article explores how the recognition of the gender identity of trans people can have negative consequences on their reproductive health and rights. First, it argues that, while both the right to gender identity and the right to sexual and reproductive health are part of the indivisible core of human rights, in practice trans people are forced to choose between them. Understanding this scenario requires focusing on the eugenic dimensions of trans policies, even in states where the recognition of a gender identity other than that assigned at birth is not tied to surgical or hormonal compromises. The concept of "passive eugenics", coined over twenty years ago by James Bowman, offers a valuable key in this respect. Second, the paper highlights some factors that hinder a successful approach to the reproductive health and rights of trans people. These factors include: the normative imageries about the reproductive capacities and desires of trans people, representations about pregnancy and "womanhood", and the form taken by identity politics in contemporary feminist movements. The attention given as a priority (if not exclusively) to initiatives for the legalisation of voluntary abortion, understood as a right pertaining to (cis) women, offers a significant example of these difficulties. Finally, the paper advocates the adoption of a reproductive justice approach to work on sexual and reproductive health and rights, arguing that it has, among other virtues, that of challenging the binary matrix that characterises Western thought.
本文探讨了对跨性别者性别认同的认可如何会对他们的生殖健康和权利产生负面影响。首先,文章认为,虽然性别认同权以及性健康和生殖健康权都是不可分割的人权核心的一部分,但实际上跨性别者被迫在两者之间做出选择。理解这种情况需要关注跨性别政策的优生学层面,即使在那些承认出生时所指定性别之外的其他性别认同并不与手术或激素干预挂钩的国家也是如此。詹姆斯·鲍曼二十多年前提出的“消极优生学”概念在这方面提供了一个有价值的关键。其次,本文强调了一些阻碍成功解决跨性别者生殖健康和权利问题的因素。这些因素包括:关于跨性别者生殖能力和欲望的规范性意象、关于怀孕和“女性特质”的表述,以及当代女权运动中身份政治所采取的形式。将自愿堕胎合法化的倡议(被视为(顺性别)女性的一项权利)被优先(如果不是唯一地)关注,这是这些困难的一个重要例子。最后,本文主张采用生殖正义方法来处理性健康和生殖健康及权利问题,认为它除其他优点外,还具有挑战构成西方思想特征的二元模式的优点。