Suppr超能文献

胆囊次全切除术安全可行吗?短期和长期结果。

Is subtotal cholecystectomy safe and feasible? Short- and long-term results.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Mar;28(3):263-271. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.847. Epub 2020 Nov 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures. However, it may result in some unpleasant conditions such as bile duct injury (BDI), bile leak, and vessel injury. Subtotal cholecystectomy (SC), which has been introduced as an alternative method for reducing the complication rates, has been reported to have lower risk of BDI when compared to total cholecystectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the indications for SC, its early and late complications and their management, and the risk factors affecting the bile leak.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients who underwent SC were included in the study, and their medical records were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were male (57.9%) and the mean age was 64.84 ± 11.35 (range: 29-86). All patients had at least one episode of cholecystitis. Forty-seven (82.5%) patients underwent surgery under emergency conditions. Postoperative bile leak/fistula, surgical site infection, and fluid collection were developed in 12 (21.1%), eight (14%), and six (10.5%) patients, respectively. Leaving the remnant tissue pouch open, presence of comorbidity and emergency operative condition were found to increase the risk of leak development (P < .001). During the average follow-up of 49 months (range: 13-98), symptomatic choledocholithiasis, symptomatic gallstones in the remnant tissue, and incisional hernia were detected within the first year of surgery in three (5.3%), four (7%), and seven (12.3%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SC is not an equivalent to total cholecystectomy, its vital benefit of lowering the risk of BDI should be considered in difficult cases.

摘要

背景

胆囊切除术是最常见的外科手术之一。然而,它可能导致一些不愉快的情况,如胆管损伤(BDI)、胆漏和血管损伤。次全胆囊切除术(SC)作为降低并发症发生率的替代方法,已被报道在降低 BDI 风险方面优于全胆囊切除术。本研究旨在评估 SC 的适应证、其早期和晚期并发症及其处理方法,以及影响胆漏的危险因素。

方法

本研究纳入了 57 例接受 SC 的患者,回顾性分析了他们的病历。

结果

33 例患者为男性(57.9%),平均年龄为 64.84 ± 11.35 岁(范围:29-86 岁)。所有患者均至少有一次胆囊炎发作。47 例(82.5%)患者在急诊情况下接受手术。术后胆漏/瘘、手术部位感染和积液分别在 12 例(21.1%)、8 例(14%)和 6 例(10.5%)患者中发生。遗留残余组织袋敞开、存在合并症和急诊手术条件被发现增加了漏液发生的风险(P<.001)。在平均 49 个月(范围:13-98)的随访期间,术后第一年分别有 3 例(5.3%)、4 例(7%)和 7 例(12.3%)患者出现症状性胆总管结石、残余组织中的症状性胆囊结石和切口疝。

结论

尽管 SC 不等同于全胆囊切除术,但在困难情况下,其降低 BDI 风险的重要益处应予以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验