Suppr超能文献

尾腔静脉塌陷指数可用于预测犬液体反应性。

Caudal vena cava collapsibility index as a tool to predict fluid responsiveness in dogs.

机构信息

Cooperative Veterinary Intensive Care Unit, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

General Surgery Service, Surgery Department, Non-sponsored Research Area, Research Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2020 Nov;30(6):677-686. doi: 10.1111/vec.13009. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of the caudal vena cava collapsibility index (CVCCI) as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in hospitalized, critically ill dogs with hemodynamic or tissue perfusion abnormalities.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Private referral center.

ANIMALS

Twenty-seven critically ill, spontaneously breathing dogs with compromised hemodynamics or tissue hypoperfusion.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The electronic medical records were searched for dogs admitted for any cause, from August 2016 to December 2017. We included dogs with ultrasound measurements of: CVCCI, performed at baseline; and velocity time integral (VTI) of the subaortic blood flow, carried out before and after a fluid load. CVCCI was estimated as: (maximum diameter-minimum diameter/maximum diameter) × 100. Dogs in which VTI increased ≥15% were considered fluid responders. The CVCCI accurately predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.00). The optimal cut-off of CVCCI that better discriminated between fluid responders and nonresponders was 27%, with 100.0% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity. At baseline, fluid responders had lower VTI (5.48 [4.26 to 7.40] vs 10.61 [7.38 to 13.23] cm, P = 0.004) than nonresponders. The basal maximum diameter of the caudal vena cava adjusted to body weight was not different between responders and nonresponders (0.050 [0.030 to 0.100] vs 0.079 [0.067 to 0.140] cm/kg, P = 0.339). The increase in VTI was related to basal CVCCI (R = 0.60, P = 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed narrow 95% limits of agreement between measurements of CVCCI and VTI performed by different observers or by the same observer.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this small cohort study suggest that CVCCI can accurately predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill dogs with perfusion abnormalities. Further research is necessary to extrapolate these results to larger populations of hospitalized dogs.

摘要

目的

评估下腔静脉塌陷指数(CVCCI)作为预测存在血流动力学或组织灌注异常的住院危重犬液体反应性的指标。

设计

回顾性观察性研究。

设置

私人转诊中心。

动物

27 只患有血流动力学不稳定或组织低灌注的危重、自主呼吸犬。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

检索了 2016 年 8 月至 2017 年 12 月期间因任何原因入院的犬的电子病历。我们纳入了超声测量 CVCCI 的犬:在基线时进行;以及主动脉下血流速度时间积分(VTI),在液体负荷前后进行。CVCCI 估计为:(最大直径-最小直径/最大直径)×100。VTI 增加≥15%的犬被认为是液体反应者。CVCCI 对液体反应性的预测具有 0.96 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(95%CI,0.88 至 1.00)。区分液体反应者和非反应者的最佳 CVCCI 截断值为 27%,具有 100.0%的敏感性和 83.3%的特异性。在基线时,液体反应者的 VTI 较低(5.48[4.26 至 7.40]比 10.61[7.38 至 13.23]cm,P=0.004)。反应者和非反应者之间下腔静脉最大直径的基础调整至体重无差异(0.050[0.030 至 0.100]比 0.079[0.067 至 0.140]cm/kg,P=0.339)。VTI 的增加与基础 CVCCI 相关(R=0.60,P=0.001)。Bland-Altman 分析显示,由不同观察者或同一观察者进行的 CVCCI 和 VTI 测量之间的 95%一致性界限较窄。

结论

这项小队列研究的结果表明,CVCCI 可以准确预测存在灌注异常的危重犬的液体反应性。需要进一步的研究将这些结果外推到更大的住院犬群体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验