Suppr超能文献

正面表面积和游泳速度变化对爬泳主动阻力的影响。

The Influence of the Frontal Surface Area and Swim Velocity Variation in Front Crawl Active Drag.

机构信息

Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, AUSTRALIA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Nov;52(11):2357-2364. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002400.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to 1) compare active drag (Da) calculation between a single land-based measurement of frontal surface area (FSA) and in-water FSA measures obtained at key events of the arm pull (1, right upper-limb catch; 2, right upper-limb insweep; 3, right upper-limb exit and left upper-limb catch; 4, left upper-limb insweep; and 5, left upper-limb exit and right upper-limb catch) at front crawl swimming, and 2) compare mechanical power variables computed based on these two approaches.

METHODS

Seventeen swimmers (11, male; 6, female; 16.15 ± 0.94 yr old) were recruited. The FSA was measured based on two approaches: (i) nonvariation, that is, assuming a constant value, and (ii) variation, that is, calculated in each key event of the front crawl swim. Active drag based on a nonvariation of the FSA was measured using the Velocity Perturbation method. Active drag based on a variation approach was measured in each key event of the front crawl according to the law of linear motion. Paired t-test (P ≤ 0.05), simple linear regression models, and Bland-Altman plots between assessment methods (variation vs nonvariation) were computed.

RESULTS

The FSA (variation) was higher than when assuming a nonvariation (0.1110 ± 0.010 vs 0.0968 ± 0.010 m, Δ = 15.69%, t = 4.40, P < 0.001, d = 0.95). Active drag (variation) was also significantly higher than when assuming a nonvariation (88.44 ± 25.92 vs 75.41 ± 15.11 N, Δ = 16.09%, t = 3.66, P = 0.002, d = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Besides the FSA, swim velocity also changes during the front crawl arm pull. The variation of both variables had a significant effect on the active drag measurement and consequently on mechanical power and total power input variables.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在:1)比较单次陆地测量的正面面积(FSA)与在水中测量的关键划臂阶段的 FSA 之间的主动阻力(Da)计算值,这些关键划臂阶段分别是:1,右臂高抓;2,右臂内划;3,右臂出水和左臂高抓;4,左臂内划;5,左臂出水和右臂高抓;2)比较基于这两种方法计算的机械功率变量。

方法

招募了 17 名游泳运动员(11 名男性;6 名女性;年龄 16.15±0.94 岁)。FSA 基于两种方法进行测量:(i)不变,即假设一个恒定值,以及(ii)变化,即在每个自由泳划臂的关键事件中进行计算。基于 FSA 不变的主动阻力是使用速度干扰法测量的。基于变化方法的主动阻力是根据线性运动定律在每个自由泳关键事件中测量的。计算了评估方法(变化与不变)之间的配对 t 检验(P≤0.05)、简单线性回归模型和 Bland-Altman 图。

结果

FSA(变化)高于假设不变时的 FSA(0.1110±0.010 比 0.0968±0.010m,Δ=15.69%,t=4.40,P<0.001,d=0.95)。主动阻力(变化)也显著高于假设不变时的主动阻力(88.44±25.92 比 75.41±15.11N,Δ=16.09%,t=3.66,P=0.002,d=0.61)。

结论

除了 FSA,在自由泳划臂过程中游泳速度也会发生变化。这两个变量的变化对主动阻力测量有显著影响,从而对机械功率和总功率输入变量有显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验