Suppr超能文献

在过去改良的旱地草原上,19 年的恢复管理对土壤和植被有什么影响?

What is the effect of 19 years of restoration managements on soil and vegetation on formerly improved upland grassland?

机构信息

Crop Research Institute, Department of Weeds and Vegetation of Agroecosystems, Grassland Research Station Liberec, CZ 460 01, Czechia.

Crop Research Institute, Department of Weeds and Vegetation of Agroecosystems, Grassland Research Station Liberec, CZ 460 01, Czechia; Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Department of Ecology, CZ 165 21, Czechia.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 10;755(Pt 2):142469. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142469. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

Abstract

Finding the best management strategies to restore grassland diversity and achieve a compromise between agricultural use and biodiversity protection is a global challenge. This paper reports novel data relating to the impacts of 19 years of restoration managements predicted to increase botanical diversity within reseeded upland temperate grassland common in less favoured areas in Europe. The treatments imposed were: continuous sheep grazing, with and without lime application; hay cutting only, with and without lime application; hay cutting followed by aftermath grazing, with and without lime application; and a control treatment continuing the previous site management (liming, NPK application and continuous sheep grazing). Defoliation type, irrespective of liming, was the key driver influencing plant species diversity (hay cutting followed by aftermath grazing > hay cutting > grazing). Grazing only managements supported grasses at the expense of forbs, and thus related plant species diversity significantly declined. Limed treatments had higher concentrations of Ca and Mg in the soil compared to those receiving no lime. However, no effects on species richness or plant species composition were found. Potassium was the only element whose plant-available concentration in the soil tended to decrease in response to cutting treatments with herbage removal. Postponing the first defoliation to the middle of the growing season enables forbs to reach seed production, and this was the most effective restoration management option for upland grassland (as hay cutting only, and as hay cut followed by aftermath grazing). Although continuous low-density sheep grazing is often adopted as a means of improving floristic biodiversity, deleterious effects of this on plant diversity mean that it cannot be recommended as a means of long-term maintenance or restoration management of European temperate grasslands.

摘要

寻找最佳的管理策略来恢复草原多样性,并在农业利用和生物多样性保护之间取得平衡,是一个全球性的挑战。本文报告了一些新的数据,这些数据涉及到 19 年的恢复管理措施对播种于欧洲较不利地区的旱地温带草原的植物多样性的影响。所施加的处理措施包括:连续绵羊放牧,有无石灰施用;干草刈割,有无石灰施用;干草刈割后后续放牧,有无石灰施用;以及继续采用先前场地管理(石灰、NPK 施用和连续绵羊放牧)的对照处理。无论是否施用石灰,刈割类型都是影响植物物种多样性的关键驱动因素(干草刈割后后续放牧>干草刈割>放牧)。仅放牧管理以牺牲杂类草为代价支持禾本科植物,因此相关植物物种多样性显著下降。施用石灰的处理措施使土壤中的 Ca 和 Mg 浓度高于未施用石灰的处理措施。然而,没有发现对物种丰富度或植物物种组成有影响。钾是唯一一种其土壤中植物有效浓度因刈割处理和刈割后地上部分移除而降低的元素。将第一次刈割推迟到生长季节中期,使杂类草能够达到种子生产,这是旱地草原(如仅干草刈割,以及干草刈割后后续放牧)最有效的恢复管理措施。虽然连续低密度绵羊放牧常常被用作改善植物区系生物多样性的一种手段,但这种放牧对植物多样性的有害影响意味着它不能被推荐作为欧洲温带草原长期维护或恢复管理的手段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验