Hao Yulei, Xin Meiying, Feng Liangshu, Wang Xinyu, Wang Xu, Ma Di, Feng Jiachun
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 18;11:812. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00812. eCollection 2020.
Stroke is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and it is increasing in prevalence. The limited therapeutic window and potential severe side effects prevent the widespread clinical application of the venous injection of thrombolytic tissue plasminogen activator and thrombectomy, which are regarded as the only approved treatments for acute ischemic stroke. Triggered by various types of mild stressors or stimuli, ischemic preconditioning (IPreC) induces adaptive endogenous tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury by activating a multitude cascade of biomolecules, for example, proteins, enzymes, receptors, transcription factors, and others, which eventually lead to transcriptional regulation and epigenetic and genomic reprogramming. During the past 30 years, IPreC has been widely studied to confirm its neuroprotection against subsequent I/R injury, mainly including local ischemic preconditioning (LIPreC), remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPreC), and cross preconditioning. Although LIPreC has a strong neuroprotective effect, the clinical application of IPreC for subsequent cerebral ischemia is difficult. There are two main reasons for the above result: Cerebral ischemia is unpredictable, and LIPreC is also capable of inducing unexpected injury with only minor differences to durations or intensity. RIPreC and pharmacological preconditioning, an easy-to-use and non-invasive therapy, can be performed in a variety of clinical settings and appear to be more suitable for the clinical management of ischemic stroke. Hoping to advance our understanding of IPreC, this review mainly focuses on recent advances in IPreC in stroke management, its challenges, and the potential study directions.
中风是全球发病和死亡的主要原因之一,其患病率正在上升。溶栓组织纤溶酶原激活剂静脉注射和血栓切除术的治疗窗口有限且存在潜在的严重副作用,这阻碍了它们在临床上的广泛应用,而这两种方法被认为是急性缺血性中风唯一被批准的治疗方法。由各种轻度应激源或刺激引发的缺血预处理(IPreC)通过激活一系列生物分子级联反应,例如蛋白质、酶、受体、转录因子等,诱导对缺血/再灌注(I/R)损伤的适应性内源性耐受,最终导致转录调控以及表观遗传和基因组重编程。在过去30年中,IPreC已被广泛研究以证实其对后续I/R损伤的神经保护作用,主要包括局部缺血预处理(LIPreC)、远程缺血预处理(RIPreC)和交叉预处理。尽管LIPreC具有强大的神经保护作用,但IPreC在后续脑缺血中的临床应用却很困难。上述结果主要有两个原因:脑缺血不可预测,并且LIPreC仅在持续时间或强度上有微小差异时也能够诱导意外损伤。RIPreC和药物预处理是一种易于使用且非侵入性的治疗方法,可以在各种临床环境中进行,似乎更适合缺血性中风的临床管理。为了增进我们对IPreC的理解,本综述主要关注IPreC在中风管理方面的最新进展、其面临的挑战以及潜在的研究方向。