School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Aug;47(8):1223-1248. doi: 10.1177/0146167220963665. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
Anti-effeminacy bias follows a specific pattern with men showing stronger anti-effeminacy bias against male targets than women. Previous explanations focused on men's higher tendency to stigmatize feminine men as homosexual and motives to maintain a dominant group status. Here, we suggest that certain expressions of anti-effeminacy bias may rather be a manifestation of men's reputation management motives for coalition formation, and be amplified among high (vs. low) masculine honor-oriented men. In three studies with samples from the United Kingdom and Turkey, we showed that men perceived feminine (vs. masculine) male targets as lower on coalitional value and were more reluctant to befriend them, yet this applied only to high (not low) honor-oriented men. Honor-oriented men's friendship reluctance was mediated by concern with losing reputation by association with targets lacking coalitional value. These findings extend understanding of anti-effeminacy bias by drawing attention to men's reputation concerns for coalitional reasons and individual differences.
男性对男性目标表现出比女性更强的反女性化偏见,反女性化偏见遵循特定模式。之前的解释主要集中在男性更倾向于将女性化的男性视为同性恋,并出于维护主导群体地位的动机。在这里,我们认为,某些反女性化偏见的表现可能更多地反映了男性为建立联盟而进行声誉管理的动机,并在高(而非低)阳刚气导向的男性中得到放大。在来自英国和土耳其的三个样本研究中,我们表明,男性认为女性化(而非男性化)的男性目标在联盟价值上较低,并且不太愿意与他们交朋友,但这仅适用于高(而非低)阳刚气导向的男性。阳刚气导向的男性的友谊犹豫是通过担心因与缺乏联盟价值的目标交往而失去声誉来介导的。这些发现通过关注男性出于联盟原因和个体差异而对声誉的关注,扩展了对反女性化偏见的理解。