Brennan T G, Jones N A, Guillou P J
St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Br J Surg. 1987 Aug;74(8):736-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740830.
Prospective randomization of 360 patients undergoing abdominal surgery determined whether a standard lateral paramedian incision was made (group A) or one of two modifications in which the anterior sheath was incised medially and posterior sheath incised laterally (group B) or vice versa (group C), in order to determine the necessity for incising both layers laterally to provide the shutter mechanism which is held responsible for the integrity of this wound. Medial incision of the anterior rectus sheath significantly reduced the time required to perform the incision (P less than 0.02) and tended to reduce wound sepsis rate. However, this was achieved at the cost of a higher incisional hernia rate (0 per cent, 2.9 per cent and 4.6 per cent in groups A, B and C respectively, P less than 0.02). We conclude that lateral incision of both anterior and posterior rectus sheath is necessary to obviate the risk of wound hernia with the lateral paramedian incision.
对360例接受腹部手术的患者进行前瞻性随机分组,确定是采用标准的旁正中切口(A组),还是采用两种改良切口之一:一种是前鞘内侧切开而后鞘外侧切开(B组),另一种是前鞘外侧切开而后鞘内侧切开(C组),目的是确定是否有必要双侧切开两层鞘膜以提供负责该伤口完整性的关闭机制。腹直肌前鞘内侧切开显著缩短了切口所需时间(P<0.02),并倾向于降低伤口感染率。然而,这是以较高的切口疝发生率为代价的(A、B、C组的切口疝发生率分别为0%、2.9%和4.6%,P<0.02)。我们得出结论,为避免旁正中切口发生伤口疝的风险,腹直肌前后鞘双侧切开是必要的。