Jin Hai, Gong Shun, Tao Yingqun, Huo Hua, Sun Xiao, Song Dandan, Xu Ming, Xu Zhaozhu, Liu Yang, Wang Shimiao, Yuan Lijia, Wang Tingting, Song Weilong, Pan He
Department of Neurosurgery, The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 83 Wenhua Road, 110016 Shenyang, China.
Department of Clinical Trail Management Agency, The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, 83 Wenhua Road, 110016 Shenyang, China.
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2020 Oct 5;6:27. doi: 10.1038/s41531-020-00130-1. eCollection 2020.
To compare the differences between asleep and awake robot-assisted deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's Disease (PD), we conducted this retrospective cohort study included 153 PD patients undergoing bilateral robot-assisted DBS from June 2017 to August 2019, of which 58 cases were performed under general anesthesia (GA) and 95 cases under local anesthesia (LA). Procedure duration, stimulation parameters, electrode implantation accuracy, intracranial air, intraoperative electrophysiological signal length, complications, and Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) measurements were recorded and compared. The clinical evaluation was conducted by two raters who were blinded to the choice of anesthesia. Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the GA group, while on stimulation off medication motor scores (UPDRS-III) were significantly improved in both the GA and LA group. ANCOVA covariated for the baseline UPDRS-III and levodopa challenge exhibited no significant differences. In terms of amplitude, frequency, and pulse width, the stimulation parameters used for DBS power-on were similar. There were no significant differences in electrode implantation accuracy, intraoperative electrophysiological signal length, or intracerebral hemorrhage (no occurrences in either group). The pneumocephalus volume was significantly smaller in the GA group. Six patients exhibited transient throat discomfort associated with tracheal intubation in the GA group. The occurrence of surgical incision infection was similar in both groups. Compared with the awake group, the asleep group exhibited a shorter procedure duration with a similar electrode implantation accuracy and short-term motor improvement. Robot-assisted asleep DBS surgery is a promising surgical method for PD.
为比较帕金森病(PD)患者在睡眠和清醒状态下接受机器人辅助深部脑刺激(DBS)手术的差异,我们进行了这项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2017年6月至2019年8月期间接受双侧机器人辅助DBS的153例PD患者,其中58例在全身麻醉(GA)下进行,95例在局部麻醉(LA)下进行。记录并比较了手术时间、刺激参数、电极植入准确性、颅内积气、术中电生理信号时长、并发症以及统一PD评定量表(UPDRS)测量结果。由两名对麻醉选择不知情的评估者进行临床评估。GA组的手术时间明显更短,而GA组和LA组在刺激关闭且未用药时的运动评分(UPDRS-III)均有显著改善。对基线UPDRS-III和左旋多巴激发试验进行协方差分析后未显示出显著差异。在幅度、频率和脉宽方面,DBS开启时使用的刺激参数相似。电极植入准确性、术中电生理信号时长或脑出血(两组均未发生)方面无显著差异。GA组的气颅体积明显更小。GA组有6例患者出现与气管插管相关的短暂咽喉不适。两组手术切口感染的发生率相似。与清醒组相比,睡眠组的手术时间更短,电极植入准确性和短期运动改善情况相似。机器人辅助睡眠DBS手术是一种有前景的PD手术方法。