• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与创伤患者院际转运中空中救护资源利用非最佳相关的因素。

Factors associated with non-optimal resource utilization of air ambulance for interfacility transfer of injured patients.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, TorontoON.

Ornge, TorontoON.

出版信息

CJEM. 2020 Sep;22(S2):S45-S54. doi: 10.1017/cem.2019.475.

DOI:10.1017/cem.2019.475
PMID:33084555
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Timely access to definitive care is associated with improved outcomes in trauma patients. The goal of this study is to identify patient, institutional and paramedic risk factors for non-optimal resource utilization for interfacility transfers of injured adult patients transported by air ambulance to a LTC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of adult emergent interfacility transports via Ornge with data collected on patient demographics, clinical status, sending facilities, transport details and paramedic qualifications. A logistic regression model was used to analyze data.

RESULTS

1777 injured patients undergoing transport with Ornge were analyzed with 805 of these undergoing non-optimal transport. Patients who had an optimal resource use were found to be older and mechanically ventilated. Risk factors increasing odds of non-optimal transport included patients transported from a nursing station (OR 1.94), transport with primary or advanced care paramedics (OR 6.57 and 1.44, respectively) and transport between both 0800-1700 and 1700-0000 (OR 1.40 and 1.54, respectively). The median delay to arrival to receiving facility if a patient had a non-optimal resource use was 40 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Three main risk factors were identified in this study. We believe that nursing stations as a sending facility and type of paramedics crew transporting patients resulted in non-optimal resource utilization primarily due to triage of lower acuity patients. However the timing of day is more likely to be a resource availability issue and something that can be further studied and potentially improved moving forward.

摘要

目的

及时获得确定性治疗与创伤患者的改善结局相关。本研究的目的是确定患者、机构和护理人员在通过空中救护车将受伤成年患者转运至长期护理机构时,资源利用不理想的风险因素。

方法

这是一项对通过 Ornge 进行的成年急症机构间转运的回顾性队列研究,收集的数据包括患者人口统计学、临床状况、发送机构、转运细节和护理人员资格。使用逻辑回归模型分析数据。

结果

对 1777 名接受 Ornge 转运的受伤患者进行了分析,其中 805 名患者的转运资源利用不理想。发现资源利用理想的患者年龄较大且需要机械通气。增加非理想转运几率的风险因素包括从护理站转运的患者(OR 1.94)、由初级或高级护理人员转运(OR 6.57 和 1.44)以及在 0800-1700 点和 1700-0000 点之间转运(OR 1.40 和 1.54)。如果患者的资源利用不理想,到达接收机构的中位数延迟为 40 分钟。

结论

本研究确定了三个主要的风险因素。我们认为,护理站作为发送机构以及转运患者的护理人员类型主要是由于对低危患者进行分诊,导致资源利用不理想。然而,一天中的时间更可能是资源可用性问题,这是一个可以进一步研究并可能在未来改进的问题。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with non-optimal resource utilization of air ambulance for interfacility transfer of injured patients.与创伤患者院际转运中空中救护资源利用非最佳相关的因素。
CJEM. 2020 Sep;22(S2):S45-S54. doi: 10.1017/cem.2019.475.
2
Risk Factors for Non-optimal Resource Utilization for Emergent Interfacility Transfers by Air Ambulance in Ontario.安大略省航空救护车紧急机构间转运资源利用非最佳的风险因素。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Jan-Feb;24(1):55-63. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1610531. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
Patient, Paramedic and Institutional Factors Associated with Delays in Interfacility Transport of Injured Patients by Air Ambulance.患者、护理人员和医疗机构因素与空中救护车转运创伤患者的院内延迟有关。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;24(6):793-799. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1701159. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
Prepatching Reduces Paramedic In-Hospital Time for Emergent Interfacility Transfers of Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation or Vasopressors: A Retrospective Cohort Study.预先贴片可减少需要机械通气或血管加压素的患者紧急院内转院的急救人员院内时间:一项回顾性队列研究。
Air Med J. 2021 Nov-Dec;40(6):431-435. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
5
Causes of Delay During Interfacility Transports of Injured Patients Transported by Air Ambulance.空中救护转运受伤患者时机构间转运延误的原因。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Sep-Oct;24(5):625-633. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1683662. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
6
A review of secondary interfacility trauma transfers meeting provincial prehospital trauma triage guidelines.对符合省级院前创伤分诊指南的二级医疗机构间创伤转运的回顾。
CJEM. 2021 Nov;23(6):837-841. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00192-x. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
7
Identifying causes of delay in interfacility transfer of patients by air ambulance.确定空中救护车患者转院延误的原因。
CJEM. 2020 Sep;22(S2):S30-S37. doi: 10.1017/cem.2019.444.
8
Impact of Prepatching on Paramedic In-Hospital Times for Emergent Interfacility Transfers.预贴片对紧急院内转运到其他机构的急救医疗服务人员院内时间的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Nov-Dec;25(6):832-838. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1852351. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
9
Can a single primary care paramedic configuration safely transport low-acuity patients in air ambulances?单一的初级护理护理人员配置能否安全地通过空中救护车运送低 acuity 患者? (注:这里“acuity”可能是“急症程度”之类的医学术语,原英文表述不太准确完整,正常应该有更明确关于“低急症程度”的具体所指描述。)
CJEM. 2018 Mar;20(2):247-255. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.392. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
10
Interfacility Transports Utilizing the 9-1-1 Emergency Medical Services System.利用911紧急医疗服务系统进行的医疗机构间转运
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(4):490-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1005258. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Use of Helicopter Transport After Severe Trauma in the US.美国严重创伤后直升机运输使用中的种族和族裔差异。
JAMA Surg. 2025 Mar 1;160(3):313-321. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6402.