文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

McKeown 微创食管切除术治疗后发生的颈吻合口瘘的危险因素:重点关注术前和术中肺功能。

Risk Factors of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage after McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Focus on Preoperative and Intraoperative Lung Function.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr 20;27(2):75-83. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00139. Epub 2020 Oct 20.


DOI:10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00139
PMID:33087661
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8058540/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical anastomotic leakage (CAL) is one of the most common complications that occur minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). It is associated with high postoperative mortality. Some risk factors still remained controversial and so accurate prediction of risk groups for CAL remained very difficult. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of CAL after McKeown MIE to predict the accuracy of the technique as early as possible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 129 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent McKeown MIE at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, between January 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for CAL and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to predict the accuracy for each quantitative data variable and determine the cutoff value. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between Group CAL and Group NCAL in FEV (p = 0.031), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.001), intraoperative minimum PaCO (p = 0.002), and hospital stays (p <0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, FEV (OR = 0.440, p = 0.047), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 4.425, p = 0.003), and intraoperative minimum PaCO (OR = 1.14, p <0.001) were identified to be three risk factors of CAL. The ROC curve analysis showed that FEV <2.18L (p = 0.029) and intraoperative minimum PaCO >45.5 mmHg (p = 0.002) demonstrated good accuracy. CONCLUSION: FEV, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and intraoperative minimum PaCO in arterial blood gas (ABG) were considered as risk factors of CAL after McKeown MIE for esophageal cancer. Preoperative FEV <2.18L and intraoperative minimum PaCO >45.5 mmHg in ABG showed good accuracy in predicting risk factors for CAL.

摘要

背景:颈吻合口漏(CAL)是微创食管切除术(MIE)中最常见的并发症之一。它与术后高死亡率有关。一些危险因素仍然存在争议,因此准确预测 CAL 的风险组仍然非常困难。本研究旨在确定 McKeown MIE 后发生 CAL 的危险因素,以便尽早预测该技术的准确性。

材料和方法:回顾性分析 2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月在河北医科大学第四医院胸外科接受 McKeown MIE 的 129 例食管癌患者。采用多因素逻辑回归分析确定 CAL 的危险因素,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析预测各定量数据变量的准确性,并确定截断值。

结果:CAL 组和 NCAL 组在 FEV(p=0.031)、新辅助化疗(p=0.001)、术中最低动脉血 PaCO(p=0.002)和住院时间(p<0.001)方面存在统计学差异。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,FEV(OR=0.440,p=0.047)、新辅助化疗(OR=4.425,p=0.003)和术中最低动脉血 PaCO(OR=1.14,p<0.001)是 CAL 的三个危险因素。ROC 曲线分析显示,FEV<2.18L(p=0.029)和术中最低动脉血 PaCO>45.5mmHg(p=0.002)具有较好的准确性。

结论:FEV、新辅助化疗和动脉血气(ABG)中的术中最低 PaCO 被认为是 McKeown MIE 治疗食管癌后 CAL 的危险因素。术前 FEV<2.18L 和术中最低 PaCO>45.5mmHg 在 ABG 中预测 CAL 危险因素具有较好的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b185/8058540/80f1d4011b3e/atcs-27-075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b185/8058540/80f1d4011b3e/atcs-27-075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b185/8058540/80f1d4011b3e/atcs-27-075-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Risk Factors of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage after McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Focus on Preoperative and Intraoperative Lung Function.

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021-4-20

[2]
Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis.

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019-2-28

[3]
[Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy].

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022-6-23

[4]
[Clinical features and risk factors of anastomotic leakage after radical esophagectomy].

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015-7-1

[5]
Modified layered hand-sewn cervical end-to-side anastomosis for minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.

J Surg Oncol. 2021-12

[6]
Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

World J Gastroenterol. 2015-12-7

[7]
Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study.

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024-1-18

[8]
Evaluation of Fibrin Sealant in Prevention of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After McKeown Esophagectomy: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021-10

[9]
A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.

Surg Endosc. 2017-6-22

[10]
Impact of perioperative decreased serum albumin level on anastomotic leakage in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BMC Cancer. 2023-12-8

引用本文的文献

[1]
Effect of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy on Pulmonary Function and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2024

[2]
Percent vital capacity predicts postoperative sarcopenia after esophagectomy in initially nonsarcopenic esophageal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Surg Today. 2024-7

[3]
The use of indocyanine green (ICYG) angiography intraoperatively to evaluate gastric conduit perfusion during esophagectomy: does it impact surgical decision-making?

Surg Endosc. 2023-11

[4]
Development of nomograms predictive of anastomotic leakage in patients before minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.

Front Surg. 2023-1-26

本文引用的文献

[1]
Predictive Value of Body Mass Index for Short-Term Outcomes of Patients with Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy: A Meta-analysis.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019-4-1

[2]
Meta-analysis of risk factors and complications associated with atrial fibrillation after oesophagectomy.

Br J Surg. 2019-4

[3]
Long-term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Ann Surg. 2019-12

[4]
Pilot Prehabilitation Program for Patients With Esophageal Cancer During Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery.

J Surg Res. 2018-10-23

[5]
Pulmonary diffusion capacity predicts major complications after esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Dis Esophagus. 2019-3-1

[6]
Assessment of graft perfusion and oxygenation for improved outcome in esophageal cancer surgery: Protocol for a single-center prospective observational study.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018-9

[7]
Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.

BMJ Open. 2018-9-4

[8]
Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer.

Br J Surg. 2018-2-7

[9]
Logistic regression analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic fistula after radical resection of esophageal-cardiac cancer.

Thorac Cancer. 2017-9-20

[10]
High serum lactate as an adjunct in the early prediction of anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy.

Int J Surg. 2017-8-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索