Interactive rhythms in the wild, in the brain, and in silico.

There are some historical divisions in methods, rationales, and purposes between studies on comparative cognition and behavioural ecology. In turn, the interaction between these two branches and studies from mathematics, computation, and neuroscience is not usual. In this short piece, we attempt to build bridges among these disciplines. We present a series of interconnected vignettes meant to illustrate what a more interdisciplinary approach looks like when successful, and its advantages. Concretely, we focus on a recent topic, namely animal rhythms in interaction, studied under different approaches. We showcase 5 research efforts, which we believe successfully link 5 particular scientific areas of rhythm research conceptualised as the following: social neuroscience, detailed rhythmic quantification, ontogeny, computational approaches, and spontaneous interactions. Our suggestions will hopefully spur a "comparative rhythms in interaction" field, which can integrate and capitalize on knowledge from zoology, comparative psychology, neuroscience, and computation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).