Suppr超能文献

一项群组可行性试验,旨在探索在英国无家可归者中心向吸烟者提供电子烟与常规护理相比的使用情况。

A cluster feasibility trial to explore the uptake and use of e-cigarettes versus usual care offered to smokers attending homeless centres in Great Britain.

机构信息

Centre for Addictive Behaviours Research, London South Bank University, London, England.

Usher Institute and SPECTRUM Consortium, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 23;15(10):e0240968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240968. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Smoking rates in the UK are at an all-time low but this masks considerable inequalities; prevalence amongst adults who are homeless remains four times higher than the national average. The objective of this trial was to assess the feasibility of supplying free e-cigarette starter kits to smokers accessing homeless centres and to estimate parameters to inform a possible future larger trial. In this feasibility cluster trial, four homeless centres in Great Britain were non-randomly allocated to either a Usual Care (UC) or E-Cigarette (EC) arm. Smokers attending the centres were recruited by staff. UC arm participants (N = 32) received advice to quit and signposting to the local Stop Smoking Service. EC arm participants (N = 48) received an EC starter kit and 4-weeks supply of e-liquid. Outcome measures were recruitment and retention rates, use of ECs, smoking cessation/reduction and completion of measures required for economic evaluation. Eighty (mean age 43 years; 65% male) of the 153 eligible participants who were invited to participate, were successfully recruited (52%) within a five-month period, and 47 (59%) of these were retained at 24 weeks. The EC intervention was well received with minimal negative effects and very few unintended consequences (e.g. lost, theft, adding illicit substances). In both study arm, depression and anxiety scores declined over the duration of the study. Substance dependence scores remained constant. Assuming those with missing follow up data were smoking, CO validated sustained abstinence at 24 weeks was 3/48 (6.25%) and 0/32 (0%) respectively for the EC and UC arms. Almost all participants present at follow-up visits completed data collection for healthcare service and health-related quality of life measures. Providing an e-cigarette starter kit to smokers experiencing homelessness was associated with reasonable recruitment and retention rates and promising evidence of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.

摘要

英国的吸烟率处于历史最低点,但这掩盖了相当大的不平等;无家可归者成年人的患病率仍然是全国平均水平的四倍。本试验的目的是评估向无家可归者中心的吸烟者免费提供电子烟入门套件的可行性,并估计参数,为未来可能进行的更大规模试验提供信息。在这项可行性集群试验中,英国的四个无家可归者中心被非随机分配到常规护理 (UC) 或电子烟 (EC) 组。中心工作人员招募吸烟者参加。UC 组参与者 (N = 32) 接受戒烟建议和当地戒烟服务的转介。EC 组参与者 (N = 48) 收到电子烟入门套件和 4 周的电子烟液供应。结果测量包括招募和保留率、电子烟使用、戒烟/减少和完成经济评估所需的措施。在受邀参加的 153 名符合条件的参与者中,有 80 名(平均年龄 43 岁;65%为男性)成功招募(52%),在五个月内,其中 47 名(59%)在 24 周时保留。EC 干预措施受到了很好的欢迎,几乎没有产生负面影响和很少出现意外后果(例如丢失、被盗、添加非法物质)。在两个研究组中,抑郁和焦虑评分在研究期间都有所下降。物质依赖评分保持不变。假设那些随访数据缺失的人仍在吸烟,CO 验证的 24 周持续戒烟率分别为 EC 组的 3/48(6.25%)和 UC 组的 0/32(0%)。几乎所有在随访时出现的参与者都完成了医疗保健服务和健康相关生活质量措施的数据收集。为无家可归的吸烟者提供电子烟入门套件与合理的招募和保留率相关,并提供了有效性和成本效益的有希望的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc55/7584191/d9f3e5461a5d/pone.0240968.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验