• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3D 打印导航模板辅助寰枢椎椎弓根螺钉与徒手螺钉治疗Ⅱ型齿状突骨折的对比研究。

Comparative study of 3D printed navigation template-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screws versus free-hand screws for type II odontoid fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, The 920th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Kunming, 650032, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, The 452 Hospital of Western Air Force, Chengdu, 610021, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2021 Feb;30(2):498-506. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06644-9. Epub 2020 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-020-06644-9
PMID:33098009
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare the safety, efficacy, and accuracy of the pedicle screws with the three-dimensional (3D) printed navigation template to the free-hand screws for type II odontoid fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients with type II odontoid fractures, treated with either template guiding pedicle screws or free-hand screws, were retrospectively assessed. The guiding group was treated with pedicle screws with the assistance of a virtual reality (VR) software-designed, 3D printed navigation template with two guide tubes. The safety rate and treatment efficacy of the screw placement, as well as the trajectory accuracy, were evaluated by respective measures and compared between two surgical groups.

RESULTS

There were reduced surgical time (P < 0.05), blood loss (P < 0.01), and C-arm shots (P < 0.01) with 3D printed template guiding screws. The rates of safe pedicle screws in both C1 and C2 were significantly higher in 3D guiding group (P < 0.01) compared to the free-hand group, and the scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) and impairment scale (ASIA) were improved in guiding group at 1 week post-surgery (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Postoperative CT and image reconstruction showed the 3D guiding group had better horizontal screw accuracy on both sides of C1 (L: P < 0.001, R: P < 0.01) and C2 (L: P < 0.001, R: P < 0.01) than free-hand group.

CONCLUSION

The herein screw technique using 3D printed navigation template leads to greater improvement in the screw safety, efficacy, and accuracy, which may be a promising alternative to free-hand surgery for the treatment of odontoid fractures.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用三维(3D)打印导航模板辅助下的经皮椎弓根螺钉与徒手螺钉治疗Ⅱ型齿状突骨折的安全性、疗效和准确性。

患者与方法

回顾性评估了 60 例接受模板引导椎弓根螺钉或徒手螺钉治疗的Ⅱ型齿状突骨折患者。在引导组中,使用虚拟现实(VR)软件设计的、带有两个导向管的 3D 打印导航模板辅助经皮椎弓根螺钉置入。通过各自的措施评估螺钉放置的安全性和治疗效果,并比较两组手术的轨迹准确性。

结果

3D 打印模板引导螺钉组的手术时间(P < 0.05)、术中出血量(P < 0.01)和 C 臂机透视次数(P < 0.01)均减少。3D 引导组 C1 和 C2 安全椎弓根螺钉的比例明显高于徒手组(P < 0.01),引导组术后 1 周视觉模拟量表(VAS)和损伤量表(ASIA)评分均有所改善(P < 0.01 和 P < 0.05)。术后 CT 和图像重建显示,3D 引导组在 C1(L:P < 0.001,R:P < 0.01)和 C2(L:P < 0.001,R:P < 0.01)两侧的水平螺钉准确性均优于徒手组。

结论

使用 3D 打印导航模板的螺钉技术可显著提高螺钉的安全性、疗效和准确性,可能成为治疗齿状突骨折的一种有前途的徒手手术替代方法。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of 3D printed navigation template-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screws versus free-hand screws for type II odontoid fractures.3D 打印导航模板辅助寰枢椎椎弓根螺钉与徒手螺钉治疗Ⅱ型齿状突骨折的对比研究。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Feb;30(2):498-506. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06644-9. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
[3D printing navigation template assisted pedicle screw placement for the treatment of typeⅡold odontoid fractures].3D打印导航模板辅助椎弓根螺钉置入治疗Ⅱ型陈旧性齿状突骨折
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Aug 25;37(8):779-85. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230011.
3
A Comparative Study of C2 Pedicle or Pars Screw Placement with Assistance from a 3-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Navigation Template versus C-Arm Based Navigation.C2 椎弓根或 pars 螺钉置钉的三维打印导航模板辅助与 C 臂导航的对比研究
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Dec 26;25:9981-9990. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918440.
4
Design and Application of a Novel Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printed Drill Navigational Guiding in Atlantoaxial Pedicle Screw Placement.一种新型个体化三维打印寰枢椎椎弓根螺钉置入钻孔导航导向器的设计与应用
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jun;114:e1-e10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.042. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
5
Clinical Application of Atlantoaxial Pedicle Screw Placement Assisted by a Modified 3D-Printed Navigation Template.改良3D打印导航模板辅助下寰枢椎椎弓根螺钉置入的临床应用
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Jul 19;73:e259. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e259.
6
Individualized 3D printed navigation template-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screws vs. free-hand screws for the treatment of upper cervical fractures.个体化3D打印导航模板辅助下寰枢椎椎弓根螺钉与徒手置入螺钉治疗上颈椎骨折的比较
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 26;9:932296. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.932296. eCollection 2022.
7
[Experimental study of individualized 3D printing-guided template combined with thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis].个性化3D打印导向模板结合胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入治疗强直性脊柱炎的实验研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020 Jul 25;33(7):649-54. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.07.011.
8
Design and basic research on accuracy of a novel individualized three-dimensional printed navigation template in atlantoaxial pedicle screw placement.新型个体化三维打印寰枢椎椎弓根置钉导航模板精度的设计与基础研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 2;14(4):e0214460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214460. eCollection 2019.
9
Comparison of 3D-printed Navigation Template-assisted Pedicle Screws versus Freehand Screws for Scoliosis in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.3D 打印导航模板辅助置钉与徒手置钉治疗儿童青少年脊柱侧凸的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2023 Mar;84(2):188-197. doi: 10.1055/a-1938-0254. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
10
Comparison of Perpendicular to the Coronal Plane versus Medial Inclination for C2 Pedicle Screw Insertion Assisted by 3D Printed Navigation Template.3D 打印导航模板辅助下经冠状面垂直与内侧倾斜入钉 C2 椎弓根螺钉的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb;15(2):563-571. doi: 10.1111/os.13535. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
3D-Printed Laminae for Kyphosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis During Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy.用于强直性脊柱炎椎弓根截骨术治疗后凸畸形的3D打印椎板
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):2038-2047. doi: 10.1111/os.70074. Epub 2025 May 22.
2
Comparison of accuracy in C1-C2 pedicle screw placement: O-arm, 3D guides, and C-arm fluoroscopy.C1-C2椎弓根螺钉置入准确性的比较:O型臂、3D导向器和C型臂透视
Sci Rep. 2025 May 6;15(1):15731. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99884-y.
3
3D-printed drill guide versus fluoroscopic-guided free-hand technique for pedicle screw insertion in the upper cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
3D打印钻孔导向器与透视引导徒手技术在上颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Musculoskelet Surg. 2025 Jan 12. doi: 10.1007/s12306-024-00879-1.
4
Clinical applications of 3D printing in spine surgery: a systematic review.3D打印在脊柱手术中的临床应用:一项系统综述。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Feb;34(2):454-471. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08594-y. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
5
Individualized 3D-printed navigation template-assisted tension band wiring for olecranon fractures.个体化 3D 打印导航模板辅助张力带钢丝固定治疗尺骨鹰嘴骨折。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 5;18(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03892-5.
6
Biomechanical comparative study of midline cortical vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectory in osteoporotic bone.骨质疏松性骨中线皮质与传统椎弓根螺钉轨迹的生物力学比较研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 18;24(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06502-x.
7
C2 pedicle screw placement on 3D-printed models for the performance assessment of CTA-based screw preclusion.基于 CTA 的螺钉规避的性能评估的 3D 打印模型中 C2 椎弓根螺钉的放置。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 3;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03498-x.
8
Comparison of Safety and Perioperative Outcomes Between Patient-specific Template-Guided and Fluoroscopic-Assisted Freehand Lumbar Screw Placement Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique.使用皮质骨轨迹技术的患者特异性模板引导与透视辅助徒手腰椎螺钉置入的安全性及围手术期结果比较
Global Spine J. 2024 Jun;14(5):1464-1471. doi: 10.1177/21925682221143333. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
3D printing in spine care: A review of current applications.脊柱护理中的3D打印:当前应用综述
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Oct 20;35:102044. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102044. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Posterior atlantoaxial internal fixation using Harms technique assisted by 3D-based navigation robot for treatment of atlantoaxial instability.后路寰枢椎内固定术联合 3D 导航机器人辅助 Harms 技术治疗寰枢椎不稳定。
BMC Surg. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01826-2.