Department of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;75(4):e13777. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13777. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
Substantial evidence supports a bidirectional relationship between diabetes and clinical depression. However, little is known about the effect of treating one condition on the control of the other. Thus, this study aimed to determine the prevalence of depression among Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients and to assess the efficacy and feasibility of escitalopram treatment of depression on their metabolic control parameters.
T2DM patients attending primary care clinics in the North of Jordan were enrolled in a cross-sectional study during the period from February to December 2019 (n = 157). Depressive symptoms were screened utilising the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) tool. Metabolic control was assessed by measurement of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), triglycerides, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Patients with moderate to severe depressive symptoms by PHQ-9 (n = 58) were interviewed by a psychiatrist to confirm a clinical diagnosis of depression. Eligible depressed patients were administered escitalopram 10 mg orally once daily for 3 months (n = 12). Thereafter, depressive symptoms and metabolic control measures were reassessed.
The prevalence of moderate to severe depressive symptoms among T2DM patients, according to PHQ-9, was 36.94%, while the prevalence of clinical depression based on interview was 7.64%. Baseline PHQ-9 scores correlated significantly with baseline levels of HbA1c, HDL, cholesterol and triglycerides. Escitalopram treatment intervention resulted in significant improvement of PHQ-9 scores without significantly improving any of the metabolic control measures.
The relationship between depression and T2DM in the context of metabolic syndrome is plausible. However, our results show that escitalopram treatment may not be associated with significant improvement in metabolic control parameters among these patients. Our study has laid the groundwork for future randomised clinical trials with larger sample size and longer follow-up.
大量证据支持糖尿病和临床抑郁症之间存在双向关系。然而,对于治疗一种疾病对另一种疾病控制的影响知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在确定 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中抑郁的患病率,并评估艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁对其代谢控制参数的疗效和可行性。
2019 年 2 月至 12 月期间,在约旦北部的初级保健诊所招募了 T2DM 患者参加横断面研究(n=157)。使用患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)工具筛查抑郁症状。通过测量糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、甘油三酯、胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)和高密度脂蛋白(HDL)来评估代谢控制。PHQ-9 中度至重度抑郁症状的患者(n=58)由精神科医生进行访谈以确认临床抑郁症诊断。符合条件的抑郁患者每天口服艾司西酞普兰 10mg,持续 3 个月(n=12)。然后,重新评估抑郁症状和代谢控制措施。
根据 PHQ-9,T2DM 患者中中度至重度抑郁症状的患病率为 36.94%,而根据访谈的临床抑郁症患病率为 7.64%。基线 PHQ-9 评分与基线 HbA1c、HDL、胆固醇和甘油三酯水平显著相关。艾司西酞普兰治疗干预可显著改善 PHQ-9 评分,但对代谢控制措施无明显改善。
代谢综合征背景下抑郁与 T2DM 之间的关系是合理的。然而,我们的结果表明,艾司西酞普兰治疗可能与这些患者代谢控制参数的显著改善无关。我们的研究为未来更大样本量和更长随访时间的随机临床试验奠定了基础。