Suppr超能文献

防止外周静脉导管失效的 SECUREment 捆绑包 - SECURE-PIVC 试验:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案。

SECUREment bundles to prevent peripheral intravenous catheter failure-the SECURE-PIVC trial: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Adjunct Senior Research Fellow position with the AVATAR group at Menzies Health Institute QLD, Griffith University.

NHMRC Fellow and Associate Professor at Griffith University, and Honorary Research Fellow at the Queensland Children's Hospital and the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2020 Oct 22;29(19):S40-S46. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.19.S40.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are widely used, but failure is unacceptably common with up to 69% failing before treatment is complete. PIVC securement reduces failure, but the optimal way to achieve this is unclear. Tapes and supplementary securement products are widely used, however rigorous testing of these to reduce PIVC failure remains unexplored.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In adult medical-surgical wards at a tertiary hospital, this pilot randomized controlled trial tests standard care (bordered polyurethane dressing plus nonsterile tape over the extension tubing) against two securement interventions (intervention one: standard care plus two sterile tape strips over the PIVC hub; intervention two: intervention one plus a tubular bandage). Patients >18 years of age requiring a PIVC for >24 hours are eligible. Patients with laboratory-confirmed positive blood cultures within 24 hours of screening, known allergy to study products, current or high-risk of skin tear, or non-English speaking without interpreter are excluded. Sample size is 35 per trial arm, and central randomization is computer-generated with allocation concealed until entry. Patients and clinical staff cannot be blinded to treatment allocation. However, infection outcomes are assessed by a blinded investigator. Primary outcome is study feasibility. Secondary outcomes (PIVC failure, dwell time, skin adverse events, PIVC colonization, and cost) are compared between groups. Feasibility outcomes are reported descriptively.

ETHICS AND TRIAL COMMENCEMENT

Ethical approvals were received from Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (HREC/18/QRBW/44571) and Griffith University (2018/1000). Trial commencement was May 2019. ACTRN12619000026123.

摘要

简介

外周静脉导管(PIVC)被广泛应用,但在治疗完成前,其失败率高达 69%,这是无法接受的。PIVC 的固定可减少失败率,但实现这一目标的最佳方法尚不清楚。胶带和补充固定产品被广泛使用,但这些产品减少 PIVC 失败的严格测试仍未被探索。

方法和分析

在一家三级医院的成人内科和外科病房中,这项试点随机对照试验将标准护理(边界型聚氨酯敷贴加非无菌胶带覆盖在延长管上)与两种固定干预措施(干预措施一:标准护理加 PIVC 管座上的两条无菌胶带条;干预措施二:干预措施一加管状绷带)进行比较。年龄>18 岁、需要 PIVC 留置>24 小时的患者符合条件。在筛选后 24 小时内实验室确认阳性血培养、已知对研究产品过敏、当前或高皮肤撕裂风险或非英语且无翻译人员的患者被排除在外。每个试验臂的样本量为 35 例,中央随机化由计算机生成,分配在入组前保密。患者和临床工作人员无法对治疗分配进行盲法。然而,感染结果由盲法研究者进行评估。主要结局是研究可行性。次要结局(PIVC 失败、留置时间、皮肤不良事件、PIVC 定植和成本)在组间进行比较。可行性结果以描述性方式报告。

伦理和试验开始

皇家布里斯班妇女医院(HREC/18/QRBW/44571)和格里菲斯大学(2018/1000)已获得伦理批准。试验于 2019 年 5 月开始。ACTRN12619000026123。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验