School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41 Suppl 1:107S-119S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000929.
Recent epidemiological findings of associations between hearing loss (HL) and poorer mobility and higher falls risk have increased the demand for ecologically valid experimental research to determine the potential mechanisms underlying human hearing-balance relationships. This review provides an overview of the laboratory-based approaches to studying human balance, identifies crucial factors that should be considered to improve the ecological validity of hearing-balance research, and provides a critical review of the scientific literature to date on the effects of HL on balance. Most present studies can be subdivided into those that examine balance changes due to the effects of (1) auditory suppression in individuals with normal hearing, (2) HL with and without hearing aids, and (3) cochlear implants in children and adults. To allow for meaningful comparisons, we based our in-depth critical review on studies that met minimum criteria of having at least one objective kinetic or kinematic measure of standing balance during a two-legged stance with feet side-by-side, for at stance duration of at least 30 sec. With this minimum criterion in place, we found mixed evidence that hearing suppression, HL, or hearing devices affects postural stability, especially when other sensory information is available and/or reliable, and task demands are relatively low. However, hearing may become more important when multiple sensory systems become unreliable, task demands, or cognitive impairments are greater, or when sounds provide important auditory cues to assist with orientation or provide early detection of an impending balance disturbance. However, more research is clearly needed, because there is a wide range of technical and experimental differences and limitations observed across the present literature. To address these gaps, we have provided a number of recommendations and suggested priorities for future research to provide the ecologically valid, reliable, and reproducible evidence needed to uncover any potential relationships between HL, balance, and falls.
最近有关听力损失 (HL) 与较差的活动能力和更高的跌倒风险之间关联的流行病学发现,增加了对生态有效实验研究的需求,以确定人类听力与平衡关系的潜在机制。本综述概述了研究人类平衡的基于实验室的方法,确定了提高听力与平衡研究生态有效性的关键因素,并对迄今为止关于 HL 对平衡影响的科学文献进行了批判性评价。目前的大多数研究可以分为三类,分别研究:(1)正常听力个体中听觉抑制对平衡的影响;(2)有和无听力辅助设备的 HL 对平衡的影响;(3)儿童和成人的人工耳蜗植入对平衡的影响。为了进行有意义的比较,我们基于至少有一项客观的站立平衡动力学或运动学测量指标的研究进行深入的批判性评价,这些研究在双脚并排站立时进行,至少持续 30 秒。根据这一最低标准,我们发现有混合证据表明听觉抑制、HL 或听力设备会影响姿势稳定性,特别是当其他感觉信息可用且/或可靠,以及任务需求相对较低时。然而,当多个感觉系统变得不可靠、任务需求或认知障碍更大,或者声音提供重要的听觉线索来帮助定向或及早发现即将发生的平衡障碍时,听力可能变得更加重要。然而,显然需要更多的研究,因为目前的文献中观察到了广泛的技术和实验差异和局限性。为了解决这些差距,我们提供了一些建议,并为未来的研究确定了优先事项,以提供生态有效、可靠和可重复的证据,以揭示 HL、平衡和跌倒之间的任何潜在关系。