From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;27(2):e453-e456. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000961.
Although the impact of stigma is known for women with urinary incontinence, it has not been well studied among the full spectrum of pelvic floor disorders. This study quantifies the level of stigma among women presenting for urogynecologic care and tests the hypothesis that stigma related to pelvic floor disorders results in a delay in care seeking for these problems.
Women presenting for new patient visits (N = 523) in university medical center-based urogynecology clinics completed 2 anonymous questionnaires (Stigma Scale for Chronic Illnesses 8-item version and Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire) before their visit. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the distributions of stigma scores. Logistic regression was used to model factors associated with a delay in seeking care. Spearman correlation was used to determine whether there was an association between stigma and bother scores.
Median stigma score was significantly higher for those presenting with complaints of urine leakage (P = 0.015), accidental bowel leakage (P < 0.001), and constipation (P < 0.001) compared with women without these symptoms. Women presenting with accidental bowel leakage had the highest median stigma score, and those presenting with pelvic organ prolapse had the lowest. Total stigma score had a moderately positive correlation (r = 0.5, P < 0.001) with bother score. In a logistic regression model, higher stigma score was associated with a decreased likelihood of waiting 1 year or more to seek care (odds ratio = 0.92, 95% confidence interval = 0.86-0.98).
Pelvic floor disorders carry varying levels of stigma. Women who feel more stigmatized by pelvic floor disorders seem to seek care earlier.
尽管尿失禁女性的耻辱感影响已众所周知,但在整个盆底功能障碍谱中,这一问题尚未得到充分研究。本研究定量评估了就诊于妇科泌尿学的女性的耻辱感水平,并验证了这样一个假设,即与盆底障碍相关的耻辱感会导致这些问题的就诊延迟。
在大学医学中心的妇科泌尿学诊所中,新患者就诊时(N=523),女性在就诊前完成了 2 份匿名问卷(慢性病耻辱量表 8 项版本和盆底困扰问卷)。Kruskal-Wallis 检验用于比较耻辱感评分的分布。Logistic 回归用于建立与就诊延迟相关的因素模型。Spearman 相关性用于确定耻辱感与困扰评分之间是否存在关联。
与无症状女性相比,报告尿漏(P=0.015)、意外粪便漏(P<0.001)和便秘(P<0.001)的女性的耻辱感评分中位数显著更高。意外粪便漏的女性的耻辱感评分中位数最高,而患有盆腔器官脱垂的女性的耻辱感评分中位数最低。总耻辱感评分与困扰评分呈中度正相关(r=0.5,P<0.001)。在逻辑回归模型中,较高的耻辱感评分与等待 1 年或更长时间寻求治疗的可能性降低相关(比值比=0.92,95%置信区间=0.86-0.98)。
盆底障碍存在不同程度的耻辱感。对盆底障碍感到更耻辱的女性似乎会更早寻求治疗。