• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪菌移植可能是治疗多次艰难梭菌感染的最佳选择:一项网状Meta分析。

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation May Be the Best Option in Treating Multiple Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Dembrovszky Fanni, Gede Noémi, Szakács Zsolt, Hegyi Péter, Kiss Szabolcs, Farkas Nelli, Molnár Zsolt, Imrei Marcell, Dohos Dóra, Péterfi Zoltán

机构信息

Medical School, Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

János Szentágothai Research Center, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

出版信息

Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Mar;10(1):201-211. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00356-9. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1007/s40121-020-00356-9
PMID:33106983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7954965/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium) infection (CDI) is the most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea with high mortality and recurrence rate; furthermore, the treatment of recurrent cases is a challenge. In this network meta-analysis, we aimed to compare all available therapies against multiple recurrent CDI (mrCDI) and rank them by efficacy.

METHODS

After a systematic search, randomized controlled trials (RCT) with any interventions against mrCDI were included. Data were extracted to the study database using Excel. Risk of bias assessment was performed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The primary outcome was the clinical cure of CDI and the secondary outcome was the recurrence of CDI. A Bayesian method was performed to investigate the efficacy rank order of therapies. We registered our protocol with the Prospero Center for Reviews and Dissemination (registration no. CRD42020160365).

RESULTS

Six RCTs with seven interventions were included in the quantitative synthesis. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) after a short course of vancomycin therapy (83%) shows the highest efficacy for clinical cure. Tolevamer and vancomycin + FMT seemed to be the most effective in preventing recurrence (87% and 75%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Vancomycin + FMT is perhaps the most effective option for the treatment and prevention of mrCDI, while tolevamer is also effective in preventing recurrence.

摘要

引言

艰难梭菌(原称梭状芽孢杆菌)感染(CDI)是医疗保健相关腹泻的最常见病因,死亡率和复发率很高;此外,复发病例的治疗是一项挑战。在这项网络荟萃分析中,我们旨在比较所有可用疗法对多重复发性CDI(mrCDI)的疗效,并按疗效进行排名。

方法

经过系统检索,纳入了针对mrCDI进行任何干预的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Excel将数据提取到研究数据库中。使用Cochrane RoB 2工具进行偏倚风险评估。主要结局是CDI的临床治愈,次要结局是CDI的复发。采用贝叶斯方法研究疗法的疗效排名顺序。我们已在Prospero综述与传播中心注册了我们的方案(注册号CRD42020160365)。

结果

定量综合分析纳入了六项RCT,共七种干预措施。根据累积排名曲线下面积值,短疗程万古霉素治疗后进行粪便微生物群移植(FMT)(83%)对临床治愈显示出最高疗效。托拉霉素和万古霉素+FMT在预防复发方面似乎最有效(分别为87%和75%)。

结论

万古霉素+FMT可能是治疗和预防mrCDI最有效的选择,而托拉霉素在预防复发方面也有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/7954965/2060b9f8f24a/40121_2020_356_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/7954965/08f613d1dc36/40121_2020_356_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/7954965/2060b9f8f24a/40121_2020_356_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/7954965/08f613d1dc36/40121_2020_356_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81a/7954965/2060b9f8f24a/40121_2020_356_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation May Be the Best Option in Treating Multiple Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Network Meta-Analysis.粪菌移植可能是治疗多次艰难梭菌感染的最佳选择:一项网状Meta分析。
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Mar;10(1):201-211. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00356-9. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
2
Prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.预防复发性艰难梭菌感染:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Anaerobe. 2020 Feb;61:102098. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102098. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
3
Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent infection: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性感染:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 23;29-30:100642. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100642. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Long-term Outcomes Following Multiply Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.复发性艰难梭菌感染和粪便微生物移植后的长期结局。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Apr;20(4):806-816.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review.粪便微生物移植治疗艰难梭菌感染:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 5;162(9):630-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-2693.
6
Randomised clinical trial: a 12-strain bacterial mixture versus faecal microbiota transplantation versus vancomycin for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections.随机临床试验:12 株细菌混合制剂与粪便微生物群移植术对比万古霉素治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;53(9):999-1009. doi: 10.1111/apt.16309. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
7
Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection.粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jun 18;76(13):935-942. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz078.
8
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides difficile in High-Risk Older Adults Is Associated with Early Recurrence.高风险老年人群中艰难梭菌的粪便微生物移植与早期复发相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Dec;65(12):3647-3651. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06147-z. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
9
[Faecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridioides difficile infection].[粪菌移植治疗艰难梭菌感染]
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80(6):633-639.
10
Low Cure Rates in Controlled Trials of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.复发性艰难梭菌感染粪便微生物群移植对照试验中低治愈率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 8;68(8):1351-1358. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy721.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of different therapies for infection in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.成人感染不同治疗方法的比较效果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jan 5;49:101151. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101151. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Clostridium difficile infection following colon subtotal resection in a patient with gallstones: A case report and review of literature.胆囊结石患者结肠次全切除术后艰难梭菌感染:一例病例报告及文献复习
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Sep 27;16(9):3048-3056. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i9.3048.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Australian consensus statements for the regulation, production and use of faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice.澳大利亚共识声明:临床实践中粪便微生物群移植的监管、生产和使用。
Gut. 2020 May;69(5):801-810. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320260. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
2
Which probiotic has the best effect on preventing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.哪种益生菌对预防艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的效果最好?系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Dig Dis. 2020 Feb;21(2):69-80. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12839.
3
Comparing the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation with bezlotoxumab in reducing the risk of recurrent infections: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
The gut microbiome dysbiosis and regulation by fecal microbiota transplantation: umbrella review.
肠道微生物群失调与粪便微生物群移植的调节:伞状综述
Front Microbiol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1286429. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1286429. eCollection 2023.
4
Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile).粪便微生物移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌(艰难梭菌)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 25;4(4):CD013871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013871.pub2.
5
The Gut Microbiome and Cancer Immunotherapy: Can We Use the Gut Microbiome as a Predictive Biomarker for Clinical Response in Cancer Immunotherapy?肠道微生物群与癌症免疫疗法:我们能否将肠道微生物群用作癌症免疫疗法临床反应的预测生物标志物?
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;13(19):4824. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194824.
比较粪便微生物群移植与贝佐妥单抗在降低复发性感染风险方面的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 7;9(11):e031145. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031145.
4
A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials exploring the role of fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent infection.一项网络荟萃分析,旨在探索粪便微生物群移植在复发性感染中的作用。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Oct;7(8):1051-1063. doi: 10.1177/2050640619854587. Epub 2019 May 27.
5
Fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection: A network meta-analysis.非达霉素与万古霉素和甲硝唑治疗艰难梭菌感染的比较:一项网状Meta分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2020 Jan;26(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Is Superior to Fidaxomicin for Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection.粪便微生物移植优于非达霉素治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Apr;156(5):1324-1332.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.019. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
Which Antimicrobial Agent is Likely to be the Best for Treating Clostridium difficile Infections? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.哪种抗菌药物可能是治疗艰难梭菌感染的最佳选择?一项随机临床试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Drug Res (Stuttg). 2019 Apr;69(4):194-200. doi: 10.1055/a-0645-1169. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
8
Comparative efficacy of treatments for Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较治疗艰难梭菌感染的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Sep;18(9):1035-1044. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30285-8. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
- From Colonization to Infection.- 从定植到感染。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Apr 10;9:646. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00646. eCollection 2018.
10
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.