Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, 11727, Egypt.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Taibah University Dental College & Hospital, Al-Madinah Al-Munawwrah, 42353, Saudi Arabia.
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;25(3):303-311. doi: 10.1007/s10006-020-00917-9. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
There is still no definitive consensus about the ideal technique in the treatment of anterior mandibular fractures. Therefore, this study aimed to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different internal fixation devices used for this type of fractures.
This was a cohort study that included 64 fracture cases. Fractures were fixed using four types of open reduction internal fixation devices: single 2.0-mm mini-locking plates, double 2.0-mm miniplates, double lag screw and double microplates. Investigated variables were surgical duration, wound dehiscence, infection, occlusion, mouth opening, patient compliance, nerve damage and postoperative oedema.
Male patients constituted 90.6% of the study sample. A proportion of 33% of the fractures were single symphysis and 67% were parasymphysis fractures. The most time-saving technique was the lag screw followed by microplate with mean/SD of 50.65 ± 4.152 min. Wound dehiscence occurred in 4.7% and 3.1% of the miniplate and the mini-locking groups respectively. Miniplate and microplate groups had small interfragmentary space at 1-month postoperative radiographs, while mini-locking and lag screw groups had no extra-callus formation.
The double lag screw and the single mini-locking plate are the most effective devices for primary bone healing of displaced mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures which is attributed to their enhanced stability. Miniplates and microplates gave functionally well-balanced fixation and were also associated with higher patient convenience due to improved adaptability and relatively lower cost than locking plates. Cost-effectiveness of lag screws in comparison to bone plates is particularly beneficial in low-income countries.
在前庭下颌骨骨折的治疗中,仍然没有明确的共识关于理想的技术。因此,本研究旨在确定四种不同的内固定装置用于这种类型的骨折的临床和影像学结果。
这是一项队列研究,包括 64 例骨折病例。骨折采用四种类型的切开复位内固定装置固定:单 2.0mm 微型锁定板、双 2.0mm 微型板、双拉力螺钉和双微板。研究的变量包括手术时间、伤口裂开、感染、咬合、张口、患者依从性、神经损伤和术后水肿。
男性患者占研究样本的 90.6%。33%的骨折为单一联合部骨折,67%为联合部下骨折。最节省时间的技术是拉力螺钉,其次是微板,平均/标准差为 50.65±4.152 分钟。微型板和微型锁定板组分别有 4.7%和 3.1%的伤口裂开。微型板和微板组在术后 1 个月的 X 线片上有较小的骨折间间隙,而微型锁定板和拉力螺钉组没有额外的骨痂形成。
双拉力螺钉和单微型锁定板是治疗移位下颌骨联合/联合部下骨折的最有效内固定装置,这归因于它们增强的稳定性。微型板和微板具有功能平衡的固定,并且由于适应性提高和相对较低的成本,比锁定板更方便患者,也具有较高的便利性。与骨板相比,拉力螺钉的成本效益在低收入国家尤其有利。