Rao Naman R, Treister Nathaniel, Axtell Andrea, Muhlbauer Jillian, He Puhan, Lau Agnes, Icyda Ross, Heng Elbert, Rinewalt Daniel, McGurk Siobhan, Kennedy Kevin, Kaneko Tsuyoshi, Cameron Duke, Sroussi Herve
Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Oral Medicine and Dentistry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Card Surg. 2020 Nov;35(11):2995-3003. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14957. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
Preoperative dental screening before cardiac valve surgery is widely accepted but its required scope remains unclear. This study evaluates two preoperative dental screening (PDS) approaches, a focused approach (FocA) and a comprehensive approach (CompA), to compare postsurgical 90-day mortality.
Retrospective cohort analysis was performed on all patients who underwent valve surgery at Brigham and Women's Hospital with FocA and Massachusetts General Hospital with CompA of PDS approach from January 2009 to December 2016. Patients with intravenous drug abuse and systemic infections were excluded. Univariate, multivariable, and subgroup analysis was performed.
A total of 1835 patients were included in the study. With FocA 96% of patients (1097/1143) received dental clearance in a single encounter with 3.3% receiving radiographs and undergoing dental extractions. With CompA 35.5% of patients (245/692) received dental clearance in a single encounter, 94.2% received radiographs, and 21.8% underwent dental extractions. There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality when comparing both PDS approach (10% vs 8.4%, P = .257). This remained unchanged in a multivariable model after adjusting for risk factors (odds ratio:1.32 [95%CI:0.91-1.93] [P = .14]). Reoperation due to infection was less in FocA (0.5%) vs CompA (2.6) (P < .001) and postoperative septicemia was increased in the FocA (1.7%) cohort when compared to the CompA (0.7%) (P < .001) patients.
There was no difference in post valve surgery 90-day mortality between patients who underwent a FocA vs CompA of PDS.
心脏瓣膜手术前进行牙科筛查已被广泛接受,但其所需范围仍不明确。本研究评估了两种术前牙科筛查(PDS)方法,即聚焦方法(FocA)和综合方法(CompA),以比较术后90天死亡率。
对2009年1月至2016年12月在布莱根妇女医院采用FocA方法和麻省总医院采用CompA方法进行PDS的所有接受瓣膜手术的患者进行回顾性队列分析。排除静脉药物滥用和全身感染患者。进行单变量、多变量和亚组分析。
共1835例患者纳入研究。采用FocA方法时,96%的患者(1097/1143)在单次就诊时获得牙科许可,3.3%的患者接受了X光检查并拔牙。采用CompA方法时,35.5%的患者(245/692)在单次就诊时获得牙科许可,94.2%的患者接受了X光检查,21.8%的患者拔牙。比较两种PDS方法时,90天死亡率无显著差异(10%对8.4%,P = 0.257)。在调整风险因素后的多变量模型中,这一结果保持不变(优势比:1.32 [95%CI:0.91 - 1.93] [P = 0.14])。与CompA方法(2.6%)相比,FocA方法(0.5%)因感染导致的再次手术较少(P < 0.001),与CompA方法(0.7%)的患者相比,FocA方法队列中的术后败血症增加(1.7%)(P < 0.001)。
接受PDS的FocA方法与CompA方法的患者瓣膜手术后90天死亡率无差异。