• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用电子患者报告结局工具(KISS)对接受抗PD-(L)1治疗的癌症患者进行随访:前瞻性可行性队列研究

Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study.

作者信息

Iivanainen Sanna, Alanko Tuomo, Vihinen Pia, Konkola Teemu, Ekstrom Jussi, Virtanen Henri, Koivunen Jussi

机构信息

Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

Docrates Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2020 Oct 28;4(10):e17898. doi: 10.2196/17898.

DOI:10.2196/17898
PMID:33112242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7657724/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a standard of care for various tumor types. Their unique spectrum of side effects demands continuous and long-lasting assessment of symptoms. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) follow-up has been shown to improve survival and quality of life of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether ePRO follow-up of cancer patients treated with ICIs is feasible. The study analyzed (1) the variety of patient reported symptoms, (2) etiology of alerts, (3) symptom correlations, and (4) patient compliance.

METHODS

In this prospective, one-arm, multi-institutional study, we recruited adult cancer patients whose advanced cancer was treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD)- ligand (L)1 agents in outpatient settings. The ePRO tool consisted of a weekly questionnaire evaluating the presence of typical side effects, with an algorithm assessing the severity of the symptom according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and an urgency algorithm sending alerts to the care team. A patient experience survey was conducted monthly. The patients were followed up to 6 months or until disease progression.

RESULTS

A total of 889 symptom questionnaires was completed by 37 patients (lung cancer, n=15; melanoma, n=9; genitourinary cancer, n=9; head and neck cancer, n=4). Patients showed good adherence to ePRO follow-up. The most common grade 1 symptoms were fatigue (28%) and itching (13%), grade 2 symptoms were loss of appetite (12%) and nausea (12%), and grade 3-4 symptoms were cough (6%) and loss of appetite (4%). The most common reasons for alerts were loss of appetite and shortness of breath. In the treatment benefit analysis, positive correlations were seen between clinical benefit and itching as well as progressive disease and chest pain.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results, ePRO follow-up of cancer patients receiving ICIs is feasible. ePROs capture a wide range of symptoms. Some symptoms correlate to treatment benefit, suggesting that individual prediction models could be generated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Register, NCT3928938; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03928938.

摘要

背景

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已成为多种肿瘤类型的标准治疗方法。其独特的副作用谱需要对症状进行持续且长期的评估。电子患者报告结局(ePRO)随访已被证明可改善接受化疗的癌症患者的生存率和生活质量。

目的

本研究旨在调查对接受ICIs治疗的癌症患者进行ePRO随访是否可行。该研究分析了(1)患者报告的症状种类,(2)警报的病因,(3)症状相关性,以及(4)患者依从性。

方法

在这项前瞻性、单臂、多机构研究中,我们招募了成年癌症患者,这些患者的晚期癌症在门诊环境中接受抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD)-配体(L)1药物治疗。ePRO工具包括一份每周问卷,评估典型副作用的存在情况,以及一种根据美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准评估症状严重程度的算法和一种向护理团队发送警报的紧急算法。每月进行一次患者体验调查。对患者随访6个月或直至疾病进展。

结果

37名患者(肺癌,n = 15;黑色素瘤,n = 9;泌尿生殖系统癌症,n = 9;头颈癌,n = 4)共完成了889份症状问卷。患者对ePRO随访表现出良好的依从性。最常见的1级症状是疲劳(28%)和瘙痒(13%),2级症状是食欲不振(12%)和恶心(12%),3 - 4级症状是咳嗽(6%)和食欲不振(4%)。警报的最常见原因是食欲不振和呼吸急促。在治疗获益分析中,临床获益与瘙痒以及疾病进展与胸痛之间存在正相关。

结论

根据结果,对接受ICIs治疗的癌症患者进行ePRO随访是可行的。ePRO能够捕捉广泛的症状。一些症状与治疗获益相关,这表明可以生成个体预测模型。

试验注册

临床试验注册,NCT3928938;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03928938 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3911/7657724/9d664f59190d/formative_v4i10e17898_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3911/7657724/83bf06f3bf91/formative_v4i10e17898_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3911/7657724/697c1e87384e/formative_v4i10e17898_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3911/7657724/0bcf0d8ac351/formative_v4i10e17898_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3911/7657724/9d664f59190d/formative_v4i10e17898_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3911/7657724/83bf06f3bf91/formative_v4i10e17898_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3911/7657724/697c1e87384e/formative_v4i10e17898_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3911/7657724/0bcf0d8ac351/formative_v4i10e17898_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3911/7657724/9d664f59190d/formative_v4i10e17898_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Follow-Up of Cancer Patients Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Therapy Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool (KISS): Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study.使用电子患者报告结局工具(KISS)对接受抗PD-(L)1治疗的癌症患者进行随访:前瞻性可行性队列研究
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Oct 28;4(10):e17898. doi: 10.2196/17898.
2
ePROs in the follow-up of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective study.癌症患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后的电子患者报告结局(ePROs):一项回顾性研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;145(3):765-774. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-02835-6. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
3
App-Controlled Treatment Monitoring and Support for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy: Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.应用程序控制的治疗监测和支持对头颈部癌症放疗患者的作用:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 19;25:e46189. doi: 10.2196/46189.
4
Comparison of the Real-World Reporting of Symptoms and Well-Being for the HER2-Directed Trastuzumab Biosimilar Ogivri With Registry Data for Herceptin in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: Prospective Observational Study (OGIPRO) of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes.HER2靶向曲妥珠单抗生物类似药Ogivri与赫赛汀治疗乳腺癌的登记数据的真实世界症状和幸福感报告比较:电子患者报告结局的前瞻性观察研究(OGIPRO)
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Apr 4;10:e54178. doi: 10.2196/54178.
5
ePRO symptom follow-up of colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and enhances the quality of patient care: a prospective multicenter study.接受奥沙利铂为基础的辅助化疗的结直肠癌患者的电子患者报告结局(ePRO)症状随访是可行的,并且提高了患者护理质量:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug;149(10):6875-6882. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04622-4. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
6
Implementing Symptom Management Follow-up Using an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Platform in Outpatients With Advanced Cancer: Longitudinal Single-Center Prospective Study.在晚期癌症门诊患者中使用电子患者报告结局平台实施症状管理随访:纵向单中心前瞻性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 10;6(5):e21458. doi: 10.2196/21458.
7
The Effect of Collaborative Reviews of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on the Congruence of Patient- and Clinician-Reported Toxicity in Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Trial.协作式电子患者报告结局评估对接受系统治疗的癌症患者的患者报告毒性与临床医生报告毒性一致性的影响:前瞻性、多中心、观察性临床试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 5;23(8):e29271. doi: 10.2196/29271.
8
Patient motivators of postoperative electronic patient-reported outcome symptom monitoring use in thoracic surgery patients: a qualitative study.术后电子患者报告结局症状监测在胸外科患者中的使用:一项定性研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 25;8(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00766-0.
9
Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial.炎症性疾病患者在先进治疗药物产品(ATMP)篮子试验中电子患者报告结局(ePRO)解决方案的开发和可用性测试。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Oct 9;7(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00634-3.
10
Feasibility, usability and acceptance of weekly electronic patient-reported outcomes among patients receiving pelvic CT- or online MR-guided radiotherapy - A prospective pilot study.盆腔CT或在线MR引导放疗患者中每周电子患者报告结局的可行性、可用性和可接受性——一项前瞻性试点研究。
Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2021 Dec 15;21:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.12.001. eCollection 2022 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Comprehensive Decision Support Tool for Chemotherapy-Cycle Prescribing: Initial Usability Study.化疗周期处方综合决策支持工具的开发:初步可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 31;9:e62749. doi: 10.2196/62749.
2
Immune checkpoint blockade for cancer therapy: current progress and perspectives.用于癌症治疗的免疫检查点阻断:当前进展与展望。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2025 Mar 13;26(3):203-226. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2300492.
3
Design and evaluation of an electronic follow-up questionnaire for patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Toxic Effects With Shared Cancer and Tissue Antigens in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.非小细胞肺癌中检查点抑制剂诱导的毒性作用与共享的癌症和组织抗原的关系。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;5(7):1043-1047. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0402.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Surveillance in Patients With Lung Cancer.基于网络的肺癌患者报告结局监测的成本效益分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Jun;14(6):1012-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
3
ePROs in the follow-up of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective study.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者电子随访问卷的设计与评估
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 26;25(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02931-x.
4
Exploring the Impact of the Multimodal CAPABLE eHealth Intervention on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Melanoma Undergoing Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition: Prospective Pilot Study.探索多模式CAPABLE电子健康干预对接受免疫检查点抑制治疗的黑色素瘤患者健康相关生活质量的影响:前瞻性试点研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jan 30;11:e58938. doi: 10.2196/58938.
5
Usability and Usefulness of a Symptom Management Coaching System for Patients With Cancer Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的癌症患者症状管理指导系统的可用性和实用性:比较混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 23;9:e57659. doi: 10.2196/57659.
6
Developing alert thresholds and self-management advice for people receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer modified Delphi survey.为接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的患者制定警报阈值和自我管理建议:一项由多国癌症支持治疗协会开展的改良德尔菲调查
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jan 7;33(2):76. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09110-0.
7
Exploring the role of health-related quality of life measures in predictive modelling for oncology: a systematic review.探索健康相关生活质量测量在肿瘤学预测模型中的作用:一项系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):305-323. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03820-y. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
8
Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) programs for monitoring symptoms among patients treated with immunotherapy: a scoping review.用于监测接受免疫治疗患者症状的患者报告结局指标(PROM)项目:一项范围综述
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Nov 1;8(6). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae102.
9
Exploring the potential of digital therapeutics: An assessment of progress and promise.探索数字疗法的潜力:对进展与前景的评估。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 12;10:20552076241277441. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277441. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
10
Digital Therapeutics for Improving Effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Drugs and Biological Products: Preclinical and Clinical Studies Supporting Development of Drug + Digital Combination Therapies for Chronic Diseases.用于提高药物和生物制品疗效的数字疗法:支持慢性病药物+数字联合疗法开发的临床前和临床研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 11;13(2):403. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020403.
癌症患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后的电子患者报告结局(ePROs):一项回顾性研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar;145(3):765-774. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-02835-6. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
4
Fatal Toxic Effects Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂相关致命性毒性作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;4(12):1721-1728. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923.
5
Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care.患者报告结局在常规医疗中的应用
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:122-134. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200383.
6
Feasibility of Implementing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events in a Multicenter Trial: NCCTG N1048.在多中心试验中实施患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准版本的可行性:NCCTG N1048。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 11;36(31):JCO2018788620. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.8620.
7
Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group.管理免疫检查点抑制剂相关毒性:癌症免疫治疗学会(SITC)毒性管理工作组的共识建议。
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;5(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0300-z.
8
Development of an integrated electronic platform for patient self-report and management of adverse events during cancer treatment.开发一个集成的电子平台,用于癌症治疗期间患者的自我报告和不良事件管理。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2305-2311. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx317.
9
Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.免疫疗法毒性管理:ESMO诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv119-iv142. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx225.
10
Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: final overall survival results of a multicentre, randomised, open-label phase 3 study (KEYNOTE-006).帕博利珠单抗对比伊匹单抗用于晚期黑色素瘤:一项多中心、随机、开放标签的 3 期研究(KEYNOTE-006)的最终总生存结果。
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31601-X. Epub 2017 Aug 16.