Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2026702. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26702.
It is not known whether nursing homes with private equity (PE) ownership have performed better or worse than other nursing homes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
To evaluate the comparative performance of PE-owned nursing homes on COVID-19 outcomes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study of 11 470 US nursing homes used the Nursing Home COVID-19 Public File from May 17, 2020, to July 2, 2020, to compare outcomes of PE-owned nursing homes with for-profit, nonprofit, and government-owned homes, adjusting for facility characteristics.
Nursing home ownership status.
Self-reported number of COVID-19 cases and deaths and deaths by any cause per 1000 residents; possessing 1-week supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE); staffing shortages.
Of 11 470 nursing homes, 7793 (67.9%) were for-profit; 2523 (22.0%), nonprofit; 511 (5.3%), government-owned; and 543 (4.7%), PE-owned; with mean (SD) COVID-19 cases per 1000 residents of 88.3 [2.1], 67.0 [3.8], 39.8 [7.6] and 110.8 [8.1], respectively. Mean (SD) COVID-19 deaths per 1000 residents were 61.9 [1.6], 66.4 [3.0], 56.2 [7.3], and 78.9 [5.9], respectively; mean deaths by any cause per 1000 residents were 78.1 [1.3], 91.5 [2.2], 67.6 [4.5], and 87.9 [4.8], respectively. In adjusted analyses, government-owned homes had 35.5 (95% CI, -69.2 to -1.8; P = .03) fewer COVID-19 cases per 1000 residents than PE-owned nursing homes. Cases in PE-owned nursing homes were not statistically different compared with for-profit and nonprofit facilities; nor were there statistically significant differences in COVID-19 deaths or deaths by any cause between PE-owned nursing homes and for-profit, nonprofit, and government-owned facilities. For-profit, nonprofit, and government-owned nursing homes were 10.5% (9.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 16.3 percentage points; P = .006), 15.0% (13.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.5 to 20.6 percentage points; P < .001), and 17.0% (14.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.5 to 23.0 percentage points; P < .001), respectively, more likely to have at least a 1-week supply of N95 masks than PE-owned nursing homes. They were 24.3% (21.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 11.8 to 30.8 percentage points; P < .001), 30.7% (27.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.7 to 36.2 percentage points; P < .001), and 29.2% (25.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 16.1 to 35.3 percentage points; P < .001) more likely to have a 1-week supply of medical gowns than PE-owned nursing homes. Government nursing homes were more likely to have a shortage of nurses (6.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.0 to 13.9 percentage points; P = .049) than PE-owned nursing homes.
In this cross-sectional study, PE-owned nursing homes performed comparably on staffing levels, resident cases, and deaths with nursing homes with other types of ownership, although their shortages of PPE may warrant monitoring.
重要性:尚不清楚在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,拥有私募股权(PE)的养老院的表现是否优于其他养老院。
目的:评估 PE 拥有的养老院在 COVID-19 结果方面的比较表现。
设计、环境和参与者:本项使用 2020 年 5 月 17 日至 7 月 2 日的美国养老院 COVID-19 公共文件的横断面研究,比较了私募股权拥有的养老院与营利性、非营利性和政府所有养老院的结果,调整了设施特征。
暴露:养老院所有权状况。
主要结果和措施:自我报告的 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数以及每千名居民的任何原因死亡人数;拥有 1 周个人防护设备(PPE)供应;人员短缺。
结果:在 11470 家养老院中,7793 家(67.9%)为营利性;2523 家(22.0%)为非营利性;511 家(5.3%)为政府所有;543 家(4.7%)为私募股权所有;每千名居民的 COVID-19 病例分别为 88.3[2.1]、67.0[3.8]、39.8[7.6]和 110.8[8.1],每千名居民的 COVID-19 死亡人数分别为 61.9[1.6]、66.4[3.0]、56.2[7.3]和 78.9[5.9],每千名居民的任何原因死亡人数分别为 78.1[1.3]、91.5[2.2]、67.6[4.5]和 87.9[4.8]。在调整分析中,与私募股权所有的养老院相比,政府所有的养老院每千名居民的 COVID-19 病例减少了 35.5(95%CI,-69.2 至-1.8;P = .03)。PE 所有的养老院与营利性和非营利性机构相比,病例数无统计学差异;PE 所有的养老院与营利性、非营利性和政府所有的养老院在 COVID-19 死亡或任何原因死亡方面也没有统计学差异。营利性、非营利性和政府所有的养老院拥有 N95 口罩至少 1 周供应量的可能性分别高 10.5%(9.1 个百分点;95%CI,1.8 至 16.3 个百分点;P = .006)、15.0%(13.0 个百分点;95%CI,5.5 至 20.6 个百分点;P < .001)和 17.0%(14.8 个百分点;95%CI,6.5 至 23.0 个百分点;P < .001),比 PE 所有的养老院分别高。它们分别有 24.3%(21.3 个百分点;95%CI,11.8 至 30.8 个百分点;P < .001)、30.7%(27.0 个百分点;95%CI,17.7 至 36.2 个百分点;P < .001)和 29.2%(25.7 个百分点;95%CI,16.1 至 35.3 个百分点;P < .001)更有可能拥有 1 周的医用长袍供应,比 PE 所有的养老院多。政府养老院的护士短缺情况更为严重(6.9 个百分点;95%CI,0.0 至 13.9 个百分点;P = .049),比 PE 所有的养老院多。
结论:在这项横断面研究中,与其他类型所有权的养老院相比,PE 拥有的养老院在人员配备水平、居民病例和死亡人数方面表现相当,尽管它们的个人防护设备短缺可能需要监测。