• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用表观扩散系数(ADC)鉴别无功能垂体大腺瘤与鞍区脑膜瘤。

Differentiating between non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas and sellar meningiomas using ADC.

作者信息

Zhang Jing, Zhao Zhiyong, Dong Li, Han Tao, Zhang Guojin, Cao Yuntai, Zhou Junlin

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Endocr Connect. 2020 Dec;9(12):1233-1239. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0434.

DOI:10.1530/EC-20-0434
PMID:33112805
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7774768/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

It is difficult to distinguish between non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFPMAs) and sellar meningiomas because of their overlapping imaging manifestations on routine MRI, especially in cases of meningiomas growing into the saddle. Here, we aimed to differentiate between these two tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and MRI characteristics.

METHODS

A total of 60 NFPMA and 52 sellar meningioma cases confirmed by the pathological analysis were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were examined via routine MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) before undergoing surgery. The clinical characteristics, MRI characteristics, and max ADC (ADCmax), average ADC (ADCmean), and minimum ADC (ADCmin) values were compared between the two tumors via Chi-square test and two sample t-tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the discrimination ability.

RESULTS

The ADCmax, ADCmean, and ADCmin values were significantly higher in NFPMAs compared to sellar meningiomas (P < 0.001 for all). Among ADC values, ADCmax demonstrated good performance with an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI, 0.823-0.969) and accuracy of 88.7%. A cut-off value of 0.97 × 10-3 mm2/s was used for ADCmax for differentiation between tumors. A combination of ADCmax values and clinicoradiological features showed the best discrimination ability for differential diagnosis between the two tumors, with an AUC of 0.981 (95% CI, 0.958-1.000) and accuracy of 96.9%.

CONCLUSION

A combination of ADCmax and clinicoradiological features demonstrates good discrimination ability and high accuracy for differentiation between NFPMAs and sellar meningiomas, and is a potential quantitative tool to aid in the selection of surgical techniques.

摘要

引言与目的

由于无功能垂体大腺瘤(NFPMAs)和鞍区脑膜瘤在常规MRI上的影像学表现重叠,尤其是脑膜瘤向鞍内生长的情况,因此很难将两者区分开来。在此,我们旨在利用表观扩散系数(ADC)值和MRI特征来鉴别这两种肿瘤。

方法

回顾性分析60例经病理分析确诊的NFPMAs患者和52例鞍区脑膜瘤患者。所有患者在手术前行常规MRI和扩散加权成像(DWI)检查。通过卡方检验和两样本t检验比较两种肿瘤的临床特征、MRI特征以及最大ADC(ADCmax)、平均ADC(ADCmean)和最小ADC(ADCmin)值。进行受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线和二元逻辑回归分析以确定鉴别能力。

结果

与鞍区脑膜瘤相比,NFPMAs的ADCmax、ADCmean和ADCmin值显著更高(所有P均<0.001)。在ADC值中,ADCmax表现良好,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.896(95%可信区间,0.823 - 0.969),准确率为88.7%。以0.97×10⁻³mm²/s作为ADCmax的临界值用于肿瘤鉴别。ADCmax值与临床放射学特征相结合在鉴别这两种肿瘤时显示出最佳鉴别能力,AUC为0.981(95%可信区间,0.958 - 1.000),准确率为96.9%。

结论

ADCmax与临床放射学特征相结合在鉴别NFPMAs和鞍区脑膜瘤方面显示出良好的鉴别能力和高准确率,是一种有助于选择手术技术的潜在定量工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/396e/7774768/4a8f721f6f1c/EC-20-0434fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/396e/7774768/4a8f721f6f1c/EC-20-0434fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/396e/7774768/4a8f721f6f1c/EC-20-0434fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Differentiating between non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas and sellar meningiomas using ADC.利用表观扩散系数(ADC)鉴别无功能垂体大腺瘤与鞍区脑膜瘤。
Endocr Connect. 2020 Dec;9(12):1233-1239. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0434.
2
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient metrics for MRI-only suspicious breast lesions: any added clinical value?仅基于MRI的可疑乳腺病变的定量表观扩散系数指标:有额外的临床价值吗?
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):7092-7104. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-331. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
3
Differentiating atypical meningioma from anaplastic meningioma using diffusion weighted imaging.使用弥散加权成像鉴别非典型脑膜瘤和间变脑膜瘤。
Clin Imaging. 2022 Feb;82:237-243. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
4
The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating type II from type I endometrial carcinoma.表观扩散系数在鉴别 II 型和 I 型子宫内膜癌中的价值。
Acta Radiol. 2021 Jul;62(7):959-965. doi: 10.1177/0284185120944913. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Meningioma: Prediction of Tumor Grade and Association with Histopathological Parameters.脑膜瘤的扩散加权成像:肿瘤分级的预测及与组织病理学参数的关联
Transl Oncol. 2015 Dec;8(6):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.012.
6
Diagnostic Effect of MRI Diffusion-weighted Imaging Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value on Postoperative Recurrence of Brain Glioma.磁共振成像扩散加权成像表观扩散系数值对脑胶质瘤术后复发的诊断价值
Altern Ther Health Med. 2023 Oct 27.
7
Differentiating between adult intracranial medulloblastoma and ependymoma using MRI.使用 MRI 鉴别成人颅内髓母细胞瘤和室管膜瘤。
Clin Radiol. 2023 Mar;78(3):e288-e293. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.11.016. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
8
Correlation Between Different ADC Fractions, Cell Count, Ki-67, Total Nucleic Areas and Average Nucleic Areas in Meningothelial Meningiomas.脑膜内皮型脑膜瘤中不同表观扩散系数分数、细胞计数、Ki-67、总核面积与平均核面积之间的相关性
Anticancer Res. 2015 Dec;35(12):6841-6.
9
Clinical and multiparametric MRI features for differentiating uterine carcinosarcoma from endometrioid adenocarcinoma.鉴别子宫癌肉瘤与子宫内膜样腺癌的临床及多参数MRI特征
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Feb 19;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01225-4.
10
Whole-tumor histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from angiomatous meningioma.基于表观弥散系数的全瘤体直方图分析鉴别颅内孤立性纤维肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤与血管性脑膜瘤。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Mar;112:186-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.023. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications-part 2. Neoplasms other than PitNET and tumor-mimicking lesions.垂体瘤影像学:第 5 版 WHO 分类更新——第 2 部分。除垂体神经内分泌肿瘤以外的肿瘤和肿瘤样病变。
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Aug;41(8):808-829. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01407-0. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
2
Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications-part 1. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma.垂体瘤影像学:第 5 版 WHO 分类更新解读-第 1 部分。垂体神经内分泌肿瘤(PitNET)/垂体腺瘤。
Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Aug;41(8):789-806. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01400-7. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient values and magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating suprasellar germinomas from chiasmatic/hypothalamic gliomas.表观扩散系数值和磁共振成像在鉴别鞍上生殖细胞瘤与视交叉/下丘脑胶质瘤中的准确性。
Neuroradiol J. 2020 Jun;33(3):201-209. doi: 10.1177/1971400920912656. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
Transpalpebral Approach for Microsurgical Removal of Tuberculum Sellae Meningiomas.经睑裂入路显微手术切除鞍结节脑膜瘤
Asian J Neurosurg. 2020 Feb 25;15(1):98-106. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_186_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
3
The ability and utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with different 'b' values in the differentiation of benign from malignant lung lesions.
不同“b”值的扩散加权磁共振成像在鉴别肺良性与恶性病变中的能力及效用
Pol J Radiol. 2020 Jan 10;85:e14-e20. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2020.92834. eCollection 2020.
4
Identification of Early Response to Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Amide Proton Transfer-weighted and Perfusion-weighted MRI compared with Diffusion-weighted MRI.复发性脑胶质瘤抗血管生成治疗早期反应的识别:酰胺质子转移加权和灌注加权 MRI 与弥散加权 MRI 的比较。
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):397-406. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191376. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
5
Diagnosis and Treatment of Parasellar Lesions.鞍旁病变的诊断与治疗。
Neuroendocrinology. 2020;110(9-10):728-739. doi: 10.1159/000506905. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
6
Analysis of 7-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the prediction of pituitary macroadenoma consistency.7 特斯拉弥散加权成像分析在预测垂体大腺瘤质地中的应用。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Feb 28;134(3):771-779. doi: 10.3171/2019.12.JNS192940. Print 2021 Mar 1.
7
Differentiating microcystic meningioma from atypical meningioma using diffusion-weighted imaging.使用弥散加权成像鉴别微囊型脑膜瘤和非典型脑膜瘤。
Neuroradiology. 2020 May;62(5):601-607. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02374-3. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
8
Differentiating intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma from meningioma using diffusion-weighted imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging.使用弥散加权成像和磁敏感加权成像鉴别颅内孤立性纤维肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤与脑膜瘤。
Neuroradiology. 2020 Feb;62(2):175-184. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02307-9. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
The clinical characteristics and molecular mechanism of pituitary adenoma associated with meningioma.垂体腺瘤合并脑膜瘤的临床特征及分子机制。
J Transl Med. 2019 Oct 29;17(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2103-0.
10
Comparison of Radiographic Approaches to Assess Treatment Response in Pituitary Adenomas: Is RECIST or RANO Good Enough?评估垂体腺瘤治疗反应的影像学方法比较:RECIST或RANO是否足够好?
J Endocr Soc. 2019 Jul 2;3(9):1693-1706. doi: 10.1210/js.2019-00130. eCollection 2019 Sep 1.