Ibba Anastasia, Corrias Francesca, Guzzetti Chiara, Casula Letizia, Salerno Mariacarolina, di Iorgi Natascia, Tornese Gianluca, Patti Giuseppa, Radetti Giorgio, Maghnie Mohamad, Cappa Marco, Loche Sandro
SSD Endocrinologia Pediatrica e Centro Screening Neonatale, Ospedale Pediatrico Microcitemico, 'A. Cao', AO Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy.
Dipartimento di Pediatria, Università Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Endocr Connect. 2020 Nov;9(11):1095-1102. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0347.
A number of studies have evaluated the role of IGF1 measurement in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and the best cut-off of IGF1 SDS in the diagnosis of GHD in a large cohort of short children and adolescents. One-hundred and forty-two children and adolescents with GHD ((63 organic/genetic (OGHD), 79 idiopathic (IGHD)) and 658 short non-GHD children (median age 10.4 years) were included in the analysis. The two groups were subdivided according to age (G1 <6, G2 6 <9, G3 9 <12, G4 ≥12) and to pubertal status. Serum IGFI was measured by the same chemiluminescence assay in all samples and expressed as age- and sex-based SDS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the optimal IGF1 SDS cut-off and the diagnostic accuracy. Median IGF1 SDS was significantly lower in the GHD than in non-GHD patients. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.69, with the best IGF1 cut-off of -1.5 SDS (sensitivity 67.61%, specificity 62.62%). The AUC was 0.75 for OGHD and 0.63 for IGHD. The accuracy was better in the pubertal (AUC = 0.81) than the prepubertal group (AUC = 0.64). In our cohort, IGF1 measurement has poor accuracy in discriminating GHD from non-GHD. Our findings confirm and reinforce the belief that IGF1 values should not be used alone in the diagnosis of GHD but should be interpreted in combination with other clinical and biochemical parameters.
多项研究评估了胰岛素样生长因子1(IGF1)检测在生长激素缺乏症(GHD)诊断中的作用。本研究旨在评估IGF1标准差评分(SDS)在一大群矮小儿童和青少年GHD诊断中的准确性及最佳临界值。分析纳入了142例GHD儿童和青少年(63例器质性/遗传性(OGHD),79例特发性(IGHD))以及658例非GHD矮小儿童(中位年龄10.4岁)。两组根据年龄(G1<6岁,G2 6<9岁,G3 9<12岁,G4≥12岁)和青春期状态进行细分。所有样本均采用相同的化学发光法检测血清IGFI,并以基于年龄和性别的SDS表示。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析评估最佳IGF1 SDS临界值及诊断准确性。GHD患者的IGF1 SDS中位数显著低于非GHD患者。曲线下面积(AUC)为0.69,最佳IGF1临界值为-1.5 SDS(敏感性67.61%,特异性62.62%)。OGHD的AUC为0.75,IGHD的AUC为0.63。青春期组(AUC = 0.81)的准确性优于青春期前组(AUC = 0.64)。在我们的队列中,IGF1检测在区分GHD与非GHD方面准确性较差。我们的研究结果证实并强化了以下观点:IGF1值不应单独用于GHD的诊断,而应结合其他临床和生化参数进行解读。