From the, Department of Psychology, (EMB, ENG, LAR), University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, (EMB), University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jan;45(1):194-203. doi: 10.1111/acer.14495. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is heterogenous. One approach to parsing this heterogeneity is to phenotype individuals by their underlying motivation to drink, specifically drinking for reward (i.e., positive reinforcement) or for relief (i.e., negative reinforcement/normalizing). Reward- versus relief-motivated behavior is thought to be associated with a shift from ventral to dorsal striatal (DS) signaling. The present study examined whether reward and relief drinking were differentially associated with other clinical characteristics and with alcohol cue-elicited activation of the ventral and dorsal striatum.
Non-treatment-seeking heavy drinkers (N = 184; 61 female, 123 male) completed the UCLA Reward, Relief, Habit Drinking Scale (RRHDS) and the Reasons for Heavy Drinking Questionnaire (RHDQ), to categorize drinking motivation. Measures of alcohol use, alcohol problems, mood, and craving were also collected. A subset of participants (N = 45; 17 female, 28 male) also completed a functional neuroimaging alcohol cue reactivity task.
RRHDS-designated relief/habit drinkers scored lower than reward drinkers on the RHDQ Reinforcement subscale (p = 0.04) and higher on the RHDQ Normalizing subscale (p = 0.004). Relief/habit drinkers also demonstrated greater AUD severity on a host of clinical measures. Relief/habit drinkers displayed higher cue-elicited DS activation compared with reward drinkers (p = 0.04), while ventral striatal cue-elicited activation did not significantly differ between groups.
Our findings support and extend the differentiation of reward from relief/habit-motivated drinking and suggest that differences in DS response to conditioned alcohol cues may underlie this distinction. Elucidating neurobiological and clinical differences between these subtypes may facilitate treatment matching and precision medicine for AUD.
酒精使用障碍(AUD)具有异质性。一种解析这种异质性的方法是通过个体的潜在饮酒动机对其进行表型分类,具体而言是为了奖励(即正强化)还是为了缓解(即负强化/正常化)而饮酒。奖励驱动与缓解驱动的行为被认为与腹侧纹状体(DS)信号从腹侧到背侧的转变有关。本研究探讨了奖励和缓解饮酒是否与其他临床特征以及与酒精线索诱发的腹侧和背侧纹状体激活存在差异。
非治疗性寻求重度饮酒者(N=184;61 名女性,123 名男性)完成了加州大学洛杉矶分校奖励、缓解、习惯性饮酒量表(RRHDS)和重度饮酒原因问卷(RHDQ),以分类饮酒动机。还收集了酒精使用、酒精问题、情绪和渴求的测量值。一部分参与者(N=45;17 名女性,28 名男性)还完成了功能性神经影像学酒精线索反应性任务。
RRHDS 指定的缓解/习惯性饮酒者在 RHDQ 强化子量表上的得分低于奖励饮酒者(p=0.04),在 RHDQ 正常化子量表上的得分高于奖励饮酒者(p=0.004)。缓解/习惯性饮酒者在一系列临床测量中也表现出更高的 AUD 严重程度。与奖励饮酒者相比,缓解/习惯性饮酒者在酒精线索诱发的 DS 激活上更高(p=0.04),而腹侧纹状体线索诱发的激活在两组之间没有显著差异。
我们的发现支持并扩展了从奖励到缓解/习惯性饮酒的区分,并表明对条件性酒精线索的 DS 反应的差异可能是这种区别的基础。阐明这些亚型之间的神经生物学和临床差异可能有助于 AUD 的治疗匹配和精准医学。