Department of Neurology, CHUM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; CHUM Research Center, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Department of Neurology, CHUM, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Seizure. 2020 Dec;83:104-123. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.09.027. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
Three decades after its introduction as an adjuvant therapeutic option in the management of selective drug-resistant epilepsy cases (DRE), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) retains growing interest. An implantable device was first approved for epilepsy in Europe in 1994 and in the United States (US) in 1997. Subsequent modifications improved the safety and the efficacy of the system. The most recent application of vagal neurostimulation is represented by transcutaneous devices that are claimed to have strong therapeutic potential. In this review, we sought to analyze the most meaningful available data describing the indications, safety and efficacy of the different approaches of VNS in clinical practice. Therefore, we identified studies reporting VNS efficacy and/or safety in epilepsy and its comorbidities from January 1990 to February 2020 from various databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, US government databases and VNS manufacturer published resources. In general, VNS efficacy becomes optimal around the sixth month of treatment and a 50-100 % seizure frequency reduction is achieved in approximately 45-65 % of the patients. However, some clinically relevant differences have been reported with specific factors such as epilepsy etiology or type, patient age as well as the delay of VNS therapy onset. VNS efficacy on seizure frequency has been demonstrated in both children and adults, in lesional and non-lesional cases, in focal and generalized epilepsies, on both seizures and epilepsy comorbidities. Regarding the latter, VNS can lead to an improvement of about 25-35 % in depression scores, 35 % in anxiety scores and 25 % in mood assessment scores. If non-invasive devices are undeniably safer, their efficacy is limited due to the scarcity of large cohort studies and the disparity of methodological approaches (study design and stimulation parameters). Overall, we believe that there is a progress margin for improving the safety of implantable devices and, above all, the effectiveness of the various VNS approaches.
自作为选择性耐药性癫痫病例(DRE)治疗选择的辅助治疗方法引入 30 年后,迷走神经刺激(VNS)仍然备受关注。1994 年,一种可植入设备在欧洲首次被批准用于治疗癫痫,1997 年在美国(US)获得批准。随后的改进提高了系统的安全性和疗效。迷走神经刺激的最新应用是经皮设备,据称具有很强的治疗潜力。在这篇综述中,我们试图分析描述 VNS 在临床实践中的不同方法的疗效和安全性的最有意义的现有数据。因此,我们从包括 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane、美国政府数据库和 VNS 制造商发布资源在内的各种数据库中,确定了报告 1990 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月期间 VNS 疗效和/或安全性的研究。一般来说,VNS 的疗效在治疗的第六个月左右达到最佳,约 45-65%的患者的癫痫发作频率降低 50-100%。然而,已经报道了一些与特定因素相关的具有临床意义的差异,例如癫痫病因或类型、患者年龄以及 VNS 治疗开始的延迟。VNS 在儿童和成人、病变和非病变病例、局灶性和全身性癫痫、癫痫发作和癫痫共病方面均显示出对癫痫发作频率的疗效。关于后者,VNS 可以使抑郁评分提高约 25-35%,焦虑评分提高 35%,情绪评估评分提高 25%。如果不可侵入性设备无疑更安全,由于缺乏大型队列研究和方法学方法(研究设计和刺激参数)的差异,其疗效有限。总的来说,我们认为可以提高植入设备的安全性,尤其是提高各种 VNS 方法的有效性,还有很大的改进空间。
Laryngorhinootologie. 2022-5
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013-10-1
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025-8-26
Acta Epileptol. 2025-5-30