• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人护理场所的原因:一项系统综述。

Reasons for the Place of Care of the Elders: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Serrano-Gemes Gema, Rich-Ruiz Manuel, Serrano-Del-Rosal Rafael

机构信息

Institute for Advanced Social Studies-Spanish National Research Council (IESA-CSIC), 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba (UCO), Reina Sofia University Hospital (HURS), 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;8(4):436. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040436.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare8040436
PMID:33120977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7712302/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Relocation is a very important event in people's lives in general, but really significant in old age. However, some predictors of relocation still need to be improved. The objective of this review was to synthesize qualitative evidence to understand the reasons of the participants to decide on the place of care of the older people.

METHODS

Systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted in six databases: Scopus, SciELO, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CINAHL, from its beginning until 29 November 2017. Qualitative or mixed studies, written in English or Spanish and addressing the decision-making process (already experienced by participants) on the place of care of older persons (65 years or older), were included in the review. PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42018084826).

RESULTS

A total of 46 articles were finally included in the analysis. Our main result is the distinction of multiple reasons for each population group involved in the decision-making process, ranking these reasons into three factors: Retention, pull and push.

CONCLUSION

This differentiation allows for a more detailed and in-depth analysis of the motivations of the different groups involved in this process.

摘要

背景

一般而言,搬迁是人们生活中的一件大事,而在老年阶段其意义尤为重大。然而,一些搬迁的预测因素仍有待完善。本综述的目的是综合定性证据,以了解参与者决定老年人护理地点的原因。

方法

对六个数据库(Scopus、SciELO、PubMed、PsycINFO、Web of Science和CINAHL)进行定性研究的系统综述,时间跨度从建库至2017年11月29日。纳入综述的研究需为定性或混合研究,用英语或西班牙语撰写,且涉及老年人(65岁及以上)护理地点的决策过程(参与者已经历过)。国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(注册号:CRD42018084826)。

结果

最终共有46篇文章纳入分析。我们的主要结果是区分了参与决策过程的每个群体的多种原因,并将这些原因分为三个因素:保留、吸引和推动。

结论

这种区分有助于对参与该过程的不同群体的动机进行更详细、更深入的分析。

相似文献

1
Reasons for the Place of Care of the Elders: A Systematic Review.老年人护理场所的原因:一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;8(4):436. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040436.
2
Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly.系统评价定性研究关于老年人护理地点决策过程中的参与者。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 23;10(3):e036551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036551.
3
Decision-making on the location of care of the elderly: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies.老年人护理地点的决策:定性研究系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 21;8(10):e022411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022411.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Experiences in the Decision-Making Regarding the Place of Care of the Elderly: A Systematic Review.老年人护理地点决策的经验:一项系统综述。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Jan 21;11(2):14. doi: 10.3390/bs11020014.
7
Older peoples' and informal caregivers' experiences, views, and needs in transitional care decision-making: a systematic review.老年人和非正式照顾者在过渡性护理决策中的经验、观点和需求:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Oct;134:104303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104303. Epub 2022 May 31.
8
Push and Pull Factors Surrounding Older Adults' Relocation to Supportive Housing: A Scoping Review.围绕老年人搬迁至支持性住房的推拉因素:一项范围综述
Can J Aging. 2021 Jun;40(2):263-281. doi: 10.1017/S0714980820000045. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
9
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
10
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.

引用本文的文献

1
Avoidant Coping of the Decision-Making Process on the Location of Care in Old Age: A Possible Conspiracy of Silence?回避老年照护地点决策过程中的应对方式:是否存在沉默共谋?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12940. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412940.
2
Experiences in the Decision-Making Regarding the Place of Care of the Elderly: A Systematic Review.老年人护理地点决策的经验:一项系统综述。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 Jan 21;11(2):14. doi: 10.3390/bs11020014.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly.系统评价定性研究关于老年人护理地点决策过程中的参与者。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 23;10(3):e036551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036551.
2
What We Need to Know About Retirement: Pressing Issues for the Coming Decade.关于退休,我们需要了解什么:未来十年的紧迫问题。
Gerontologist. 2018 Sep 14;58(5):805-812. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx095.
3
Do Family Caregivers Offset Healthcare Costs for Older Adults? A Mapping Review on the Costs of Care for Older Adults With Versus Without Caregivers.
家庭照顾者是否能减轻老年人的医疗费用负担?对有照顾者和无照顾者的老年人护理成本的成本效益分析综述。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e535-e551. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny182.
4
Decision-making on the location of care of the elderly: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies.老年人护理地点的决策:定性研究系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 21;8(10):e022411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022411.
5
A mixed methods thematic review: Health-related decision-making by the older person.混合方法主题综述:老年人的健康相关决策。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(7-8):e1327-e1343. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14261.
6
Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults.居家还是迁居的抉择:对影响体弱老年人住房决策因素的系统评价
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189266. eCollection 2018.
7
"It Can't Happen Soon Enough." The Role of Readiness in Residential Moves by Older Parents.“越快越好。” 准备状态在老年父母迁居住所过程中的作用。
Gerontologist. 2017 Feb;57(1):6-11. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw101. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
8
Free choice in residential care for older people - A philosophical reflection.老年人在机构照料中的自由选择——一种哲学思考
J Aging Stud. 2016 Apr;37:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
9
A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care.撰写定性系统评价方案指南,以加强护理和医疗保健中的循证实践
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Jun;13(3):241-9. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12134. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
10
Not ageing in place: Negotiating meanings of residency in age-related housing.非就地养老:协商老年住房中的居住意义
J Aging Stud. 2015 Dec;35:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 24.