Department of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
University of Lille, Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées, Lille, France.
Haematologica. 2021 Nov 1;106(11):2834-2844. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.261107.
Venetoclax (Ven), an orally administered, potent BCL-2 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) in combination with rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab (G). Our aim was to investigate the addition of bendamustine (B) to these Ven-containing regimens in relapsed/refractory (R/R) or first-line (1L) CLL. This multi-arm, non-randomized, open-label, phase 1b study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety/tolerability of Ven with BR/BG, with 3+3 dose-escalation followed by safety expansion. Patients received Ven (schedule A) or BR/BG first (schedule B) to compare safety and determine dose/schedule for expansion. Six Ven-BR/-BG cycles were to be administered, then Ven monotherapy until disease progression (R/R) or fixed-duration 1-year treatment (1L). Overall, 33 R/R and 50 1L patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed (doses 100-400-mg), and the MTD was not reached. Safety was similar between schedules; no tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) occurred during dose-finding. Schedule B and Ven 400-mg were chosen for expansion. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia: R/R 64%, 1L Ven-BR 85%, 1L Ven-BG 55%. Grade 3-4 infection rate was: R/R 27%, 1L Ven-BR 0%, 1L Ven-BG 27%. During expansion, one clinical and two laboratory TLS cases occurred. Fewer than half the patients completed six combination therapy cycles with all study drugs; rates of bendamustine discontinuation were high. Overall response rate was 91% in R/R and 100% in 1L patients (16/49 1L patients received Ven for >1 year). In conclusion, addition of bendamustine to Ven-R/-G increased toxicity without apparent efficacy benefit.
维奈托克(Ven)是一种口服的、强效的 BCL-2 抑制剂,在与利妥昔单抗(R)或奥滨尤妥珠单抗(G)联合治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)方面显示出疗效。我们的目的是研究在复发/难治性(R/R)或一线(1L)CLL 患者中,将苯达莫司汀(B)加入这些包含 Ven 的方案中。这项多臂、非随机、开放性、1b 期研究旨在评估 Ven 联合 BR/BG 的最大耐受剂量(MTD)和安全性/耐受性,采用 3+3 剂量递增,然后进行安全性扩展。患者接受 Ven(方案 A)或 BR/BG 先行治疗(方案 B),以比较安全性并确定扩展的剂量/方案。进行 6 个 Ven-BR/-BG 周期,然后给予 Ven 单药治疗,直至疾病进展(R/R)或固定持续 1 年的治疗(1L)。总体而言,共入组 33 例 R/R 和 50 例 1L 患者。未观察到剂量限制性毒性(剂量 100-400mg),且未达到 MTD。两个方案的安全性相似;在剂量探索期间未发生肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS)。选择方案 B 和 Ven 400mg 进行扩展。最常见的 3-4 级毒性为中性粒细胞减少症:R/R 64%,1L Ven-BR 85%,1L Ven-BG 55%。3-4 级感染率为:R/R 27%,1L Ven-BR 0%,1L Ven-BG 27%。在扩展期间,发生了 1 例临床 TLS 和 2 例实验室 TLS 病例。不到一半的患者完成了所有研究药物的 6 个联合治疗周期;苯达莫司汀停药率较高。R/R 患者的总缓解率为 91%,1L 患者为 100%(16/49 例 1L 患者接受 Ven 治疗>1 年)。总之,在 Ven-R/-G 中加入苯达莫司汀增加了毒性,但没有明显的疗效获益。