Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Queensland Centre of Evidence-Based Nursing and Midwifery, Joanna Briggs Institute Centres of Excellence, Brisbane, Australia.
Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Centre for Evidence-based Practice South Australia (CEPSA), Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Adelaide, Australia.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
OBJECTIVES: Scoping reviews are being increasingly used by researchers. The objective of this article was to outline some challenges and potential solutions to improve the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The JBI scoping review methodology group consists of 9 experts in the field of scoping reviews. This article summarizes the key issues facing reviewers who conduct scoping reviews and those who use the results from scoping reviews and may engage in consultations during their development. RESULTS: Several key issues have been identified for reviewers as challenges in conducting scoping reviews. Challenges may be faced throughout the conduct of the review, from developing the a priori protocol to finalizing the review report for publication and developing implications or recommendations for research, policy, and practice from the results of the review. Challenges to publishing scoping reviews may stem from a lack of understanding of scoping reviews by journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers to extending the conclusion drawn from these reviews to generate recommendations for practice and policy. CONCLUSION: By identifying and overcoming challenges to the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews, reviewers may better ensure that scoping reviews are effective in meeting the objectives of scoping reviews.
目的: 研究者越来越多地使用范围综述。本文旨在概述一些挑战和潜在的解决方案,以改进范围综述的实施和报告。
研究设计与设置: JBI 范围综述方法学小组由 9 名在范围综述领域的专家组成。本文总结了开展范围综述的审查者以及使用范围综述结果并可能在其制定过程中进行协商的审查者所面临的主要问题。
结果: 已确定了在开展范围综述时审查者面临的一些关键问题。这些挑战可能在整个审查过程中出现,从制定预先设定的方案到最终出版审查报告,以及从审查结果中为研究、政策和实践制定影响或建议。发表范围综述的挑战可能源于期刊编辑、作者和同行评审者对范围综述的理解不足,无法将这些综述得出的结论扩展为实践和政策建议。
结论: 通过确定和克服范围综述实施和报告方面的挑战,审查者可以更好地确保范围综述能够有效实现范围综述的目标。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021-2
JBI Evid Implement. 2021-3
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022-9
JBI Evid Synth. 2020-10
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020-11
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016-2-9
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014-7-14
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022-12
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015-9
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2025-2-21
J Med Life. 2025-6
BMJ Open. 2025-7-25
J Occup Rehabil. 2025-7-23
Public Health Chall. 2025-6-26