Kawaguchi A, Szentpetery S, Mohanakumar T, Barnhart G R, Lower R R
McGuire Veterans Administration Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.
J Heart Transplant. 1987 Jul-Aug;6(4):214-7.
The prophylactic use of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) was evaluated in 13 cardiac allograft recipients who received a low-dose of RATG (175 +/- 32 mg) after transplantation (group 1). The patients were retrospectively compared with 13 parallel cases receiving the same treatment except for the initial RATG (group 2). There were no differences in the patient composition and the level of the basic immunosuppression therapy with cyclosporine. The patients treated with RATG (group 1) showed substantially greater suppression of T helper and total T cells up to 10 and 20 days after surgery, respectively. The incidence of rejection episodes during the initial admission seemed lower in patients receiving RATG, with a borderline significance (1.4 versus 2.4, p = 0.06). This accounts for the reduced requirement of methylprednisolone in treating rejection in patients in group 1 (1.3 gm versus 4.0 gm, p less than 0.02). Moreover, the patients without initial doses of RATG (group 2) more frequently experienced recurrent rejection (five of 12 versus nine of 10, p less than 0.05), which necessitated rescue RATG; the initial difference in the RATG usage disappeared by the time of discharge. Serious infection occurring after antirejection therapy was common in the group 2 patients without initial doses of RATG, although the overall incidence of infection was not statistically different. Prophylactic use of RATG at the dosage used appeared to reduce the incidence of rejection and the requirement for intravenous steroids and other immunosuppressants. It seems warranted to test this approach in a prospective randomized manner.
对13例心脏移植受者进行了兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(RATG)预防性使用的评估,这些患者在移植后接受了低剂量的RATG(175±32mg)(第1组)。将这些患者与13例平行病例进行回顾性比较,这些平行病例接受相同治疗,但未使用初始RATG(第2组)。两组患者的构成以及环孢素基础免疫抑制治疗水平没有差异。接受RATG治疗的患者(第1组)在术后10天和20天时,分别显示出对辅助性T细胞和总T细胞的抑制作用明显更强。在初次住院期间,接受RATG的患者排斥反应的发生率似乎较低,具有临界显著性(1.4对2.4,p=0.06)。这解释了第1组患者在治疗排斥反应时甲基强的松龙需求的减少(1.3克对4.0克,p<0.02)。此外,未使用初始剂量RATG的患者(第2组)更频繁地经历反复排斥反应(12例中的5例对10例中的9例,p<0.05),这需要使用挽救性RATG;到出院时,RATG使用的初始差异消失。在未使用初始剂量RATG的第2组患者中,抗排斥治疗后发生严重感染很常见,尽管总体感染发生率没有统计学差异。以所用剂量预防性使用RATG似乎可以降低排斥反应的发生率以及静脉类固醇和其他免疫抑制剂的需求。以前瞻性随机方式测试这种方法似乎是有必要的。