Wolfes Julian, Ellermann Christian, Burde Sophie, Leitz Patrick, Bögeholz Nils, Willy Kevin, Fehr Michael, Reinke Florian, Eckardt Lars, Frommeyer Gerrit
Department of Cardiology II (Electrophysiology), University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Munster, Germany.
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2021 Mar;21(3):248-254. doi: 10.1007/s12012-020-09616-z. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
Several case reports suggest QT prolongation leading to ventricular arrhythmias with fatal outcome after intoxication with the μ-opioid receptor agonist and anti-diarrheal agent loperamide. The number of cases of loperamide misuse are growing due to its potential stimulating effects. Loperamide intoxications can be treated by naloxone. However, previous reports described a further QT prolongation associated with naloxone administration. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of loperamide and naloxone on the cardiac electrophysiology in a sensitive whole-heart model. Twenty-six hearts of New Zealand White rabbits were retrogradely perfused in a modified Langendorff apparatus. Monophasic action potentials were recorded by endo- and epicardially positioned catheters. Hearts were stimulated at different cycle lengths, thereby obtaining action potential duration at 90% of repolarization (APD) and QT intervals. Programmed ventricular stimulation was used to assess ventricular vulnerability. Fourteen hearts were perfused with ascending concentrations of loperamide (0.2 μM, 0.35 μM, and 0.5 μM) after obtaining baseline data. Another 12 hearts were treated with naloxone (0.1 μM, 0.5 μM, 2 μM). Loperamide led to a significant increase in QT interval, APD, and ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes. In contrast, naloxone led to a decrease in QT interval and APD. Accordingly, the number of VT episodes was unaltered. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental study that investigated the effects of loperamide and naloxone in a whole-heart model. Loperamide led to a significant increase in action potential duration and QT interval. Simultaneously, the number of ventricular tachycardias was significantly increased. In contrast, naloxone led to a shortening of the action potential duration without altering arrhythmia susceptibility.
几例病例报告显示,使用μ-阿片受体激动剂及止泻药洛哌丁胺中毒后会出现QT间期延长,进而导致室性心律失常,并造成致命后果。由于洛哌丁胺具有潜在的兴奋作用,其滥用病例数量正在增加。洛哌丁胺中毒可用纳洛酮治疗。然而,既往报告称纳洛酮给药会导致QT间期进一步延长。因此,本研究的目的是在敏感的全心脏模型中研究洛哌丁胺和纳洛酮对心脏电生理的影响。26只新西兰白兔的心脏在改良的Langendorff装置中进行逆行灌注。通过心内膜和心外膜放置的导管记录单相动作电位。以不同的心动周期长度刺激心脏,从而获得复极化90%时的动作电位时程(APD)和QT间期。采用程控心室刺激来评估心室易损性。在获得基线数据后,对14只心脏灌注浓度递增的洛哌丁胺(0.2μM、0.35μM和0.5μM)。另外12只心脏用纳洛酮(0.1μM、0.5μM、2μM)治疗。洛哌丁胺导致QT间期、APD和室性心动过速(VT)发作显著增加。相比之下,纳洛酮导致QT间期和APD缩短。相应地,VT发作次数未改变。据我们所知,这是第一项在全心脏模型中研究洛哌丁胺和纳洛酮作用的实验研究。洛哌丁胺导致动作电位时程和QT间期显著增加。同时,室性心动过速的次数显著增加。相比之下,纳洛酮导致动作电位时程缩短,而不改变心律失常易感性。