Suppr超能文献

军事医疗事故不断变化的局面:从费雷斯原则到当下。

The changing landscape of military medical malpractice: from the Feres Doctrine to present.

作者信息

Dewar Callum D, Boulter Jason H, Curry Brian P, Bowers Dana M, Bell Randy S

机构信息

1Division of Neurosurgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda.

2Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda; and.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Nov;49(5):E7. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20594.

Abstract

Medical malpractice suits within the military have historically been limited by the Feres Doctrine, a legal precedent arising from a Supreme Court decision in 1950, which stated that active-duty personnel cannot bring suit for malpractice against either the United States government or military healthcare providers. This precedent has increasingly become a focus of discussion and reform as multiple cases claiming malpractice have been dismissed. Recently, however, the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020 initiated the first change to this precedent by creating an administrative body with the sole purpose of evaluating and settling claims of medical malpractice within the military's $50 billion healthcare system. This article seeks to present the legal history related to military malpractice and the Feres Doctrine as well as discuss the potential future implications that may arise as the Feres Doctrine is modified for the first time in 70 years.

摘要

历史上,军队内部的医疗事故诉讼一直受到费雷斯原则的限制,这一法律先例源于1950年最高法院的一项裁决,该裁决规定现役人员不能就医疗事故对美国政府或军队医疗服务提供者提起诉讼。随着多起声称存在医疗事故的案件被驳回,这一先例越来越成为讨论和改革的焦点。然而,最近,2020年的《国防授权法》对这一先例进行了首次修改,设立了一个行政机构,其唯一目的是评估和解决军队500亿美元医疗系统内的医疗事故索赔。本文旨在介绍与军队医疗事故和费雷斯原则相关的法律历史,并讨论在费雷斯原则70年来首次修改的情况下可能产生的未来潜在影响。

相似文献

2
Military medical malpractice and "the right to sue".军事医疗事故和“诉权”。
Clin Dermatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.06.005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验