Suppr超能文献

依那西普生物类似药在风湿免疫科的处方应用能否改变药物费用曲线?

Does Etanercept Biosimilar Prescription in a Rheumatology Center Bend the Medication Cost Curve?

机构信息

W.D. Müskens, MD, MSc, Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen;

S.A. Rongen-van Dartel, PhD, P.L. van Riel, MD, PhD, Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, and Department of Rheumatology, Bernhoven, Uden.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2021 Dec;48(12):1803-1809. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200565. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The market entry of biosimilars is expected to bring budgetary relief. Our objective was to determine how the introduction of biosimilars influences medication costs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and which patients gain access to biologics due to the availability of biosimilars.

METHODS

Using hospital data of patients with RA between 2014 and 2018, an interrupted time series was performed. The interruption in the time series was placed at June 2016 (i.e., the introduction of the etanercept biosimilar). The changes in trends for rheumatic medication costs before and after the interruption were measured. Secondary analyses focused on explaining these trends.

RESULTS

In the first quarter after the interruption, there was a decrease in total costs for biologic users of -€63,020 (95% CI -€96,487 to -€29,553, = 0.001). The postinterruption trend did not differ from the preinterruption trend (95% CI -€6695 to €6715, = 0.998) and after 3 quarters, the medication costs were back at the interruption level. After the interruption, the average cost per biologic user decreased by -€370 (95% CI -€602 to -€138, = 0.005), followed by a quarterly decrease (relative to the preinterruption trend; 95% CI -€86 to -€14, = 0.010), bending the average cost curve. The percentage of patients being treated with biologics increased in postinterruption by 0.50 percentage points quarterly (95% CI 0.38-0.62, < 0.001). Also, the average age at the start of the first biologic increased after the interruption ( = 0.057).

CONCLUSION

The average cost per patient treated with biologics decreased after the introduction of biosimilars with a persistent trend. However, the budgetary relief due to market entry of biosimilars vanished quickly due to an increase in patients treated with biologics.

摘要

目的

生物类似药的市场准入预计将带来预算缓解。我们的目的是确定生物类似药的引入如何影响类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的药物费用,以及由于生物类似药的可用性,哪些患者可以获得生物制剂。

方法

使用 2014 年至 2018 年期间 RA 患者的医院数据,进行了中断时间序列分析。时间序列的中断时间设置在 2016 年 6 月(即依那西普生物类似药的引入)。测量中断前后风湿药物费用趋势的变化。次要分析重点解释这些趋势。

结果

在中断后的第一个季度,生物制剂使用者的总费用下降了-€63,020(95%CI-€96,487 至-€29,553, = 0.001)。中断后的趋势与中断前的趋势没有差异(95%CI-€6695 至 €6715, = 0.998),并且在 3 个季度后,药物费用恢复到中断水平。中断后,每位生物制剂使用者的平均费用下降了-€370(95%CI-€602 至 -€138, = 0.005),随后每个季度都在下降(相对于中断前的趋势;95%CI-€86 至 -€14, = 0.010),使平均费用曲线弯曲。中断后,接受生物制剂治疗的患者比例每季度增加 0.50 个百分点(95%CI 0.38-0.62, < 0.001)。此外,开始使用第一种生物制剂的患者的平均年龄在中断后增加( = 0.057)。

结论

生物类似药引入后,每位接受生物制剂治疗的患者的平均成本下降,且呈持续趋势。然而,由于接受生物制剂治疗的患者增加,生物类似药市场准入带来的预算缓解很快就消失了。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验