Fujimoto Yoshihiro, Matsuyama Tasuku, Morita Sachiko, Ehara Naoki, Miyamae Nobuhiro, Okada Yohei, Jo Takaaki, Sumida Yasuyuki, Okada Nobunaga, Watanabe Makoto, Nozawa Masahiro, Tsuruoka Ayumu, Okumura Yoshiki, Kitamura Tetsuhisa, Takegami Tetsuro
Department of Emergency Medicine Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital Kyoto Japan.
Department of Emergency Medicine Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Acute Med Surg. 2020 Oct 27;7(1):e578. doi: 10.1002/ams2.578. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
The recommendation that patients with accidental hypothermia should be transported to specialized centers that can provide extracorporeal life support has not been validated, and the efficacy remains unclear.
This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with a body temperature of ≤35°C presenting at the emergency department of 12 hospitals in Japan between April 2011 and March 2016. We divided the patients into two groups based on the point of care delivery: critical care medical center (CCMC) or non-CCMC. The primary outcome of this study was in-hospital death. In-hospital death was compared using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Subgroup analyses were carried out according to patients with severe hypothermia (<28°C) or systolic blood pressure (sBP) of <90 mmHg.
A total of 537 patients were included, 413 patients (76.9%) in the CCMC group and 124 patients (23.1%) in the non-CCMC group. The in-hospital death rate was lower in the CCMC group than in the non-CCMC group (22.3% versus 31.5%, < 0.001). The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of the CCMC group was 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.90). In subgroup analyses, patients with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg in the CCMC group were less likely to experience in-hospital death (AOR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.56). However, no such association was observed among patients with severe hypothermia (AOR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.63-1.85).
Our multicenter study indicated that care at a CCMC was associated with improved outcomes in patients with accidental hypothermia.
意外低温患者应被转运至能够提供体外生命支持的专业中心这一建议尚未得到验证,其疗效仍不明确。
这是一项多中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2011年4月至2016年3月期间在日本12家医院急诊科就诊的体温≤35°C的患者。我们根据医疗服务点将患者分为两组:重症监护医疗中心(CCMC)或非CCMC。本研究的主要结局是院内死亡。使用多变量逻辑回归分析比较院内死亡情况。根据严重低温(<28°C)或收缩压(sBP)<90 mmHg的患者进行亚组分析。
共纳入537例患者,CCMC组413例(76.9%),非CCMC组124例(23.1%)。CCMC组的院内死亡率低于非CCMC组(22.3%对31.5%,<0.001)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,CCMC组的调整优势比(AOR)为0.54(95%置信区间,0.32 - 0.90)。在亚组分析中,CCMC组收缩压<90 mmHg的患者院内死亡可能性较小(AOR 0.36;95% CI,0.23 - 0.56)。然而,在严重低温患者中未观察到此类关联(AOR 1.08;95% CI,0.63 - 1.85)。
我们的多中心研究表明,在CCMC接受治疗与意外低温患者的预后改善相关。