Yoshida Shuhei, Koshima Isao, Imai Hirofumi, Uchiki Toshio, Sasaki Ayano, Fujioka Yumio, Nagamatsu Shogo, Yokota Kazunori, Yamashita Shuji
International Center for Lymphedema, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 27;8(5):e2860. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002860. eCollection 2020 May.
Although patients with obesity-induced lymphedema can be treated by weight loss therapy, they find it difficult to lose the required amount of weight. The aims of this study were to clarify the characteristics of the lymphatic vessels in patients with obesity-induced lymphedema and to determine the feasibility and efficacy of lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) in these patients.
Twenty-two patients (44 edematous lower limbs) with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m (obese group) and 91 patients with lymphedema (141 edematous lower limbs) and BMI <25 kg/m were enrolled as a control group (nonobese group) and underwent LVA. The diameter and depth of lymphatics and the effect of LVA were compared.
Lymphatics were detectable within 10-mm depth in the nonobese group and the obese group (3.0 ± 1.4 mm versus 3.5 ± 2.1 mm; < 0.01). The lymphatic diameter was significantly greater in the obese group than in the nonobese group (0.79 ± 0.30 mm versus 0.54 ± 0.22 mm; < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the rate of improvement in lymphedema after LVA between the nonobese group (9.1% ± 9.2%) and the obese group (8.9% ± 7.3%; = 0.84). There was no correlation between the improvement rate of lymphedema and that of BMI in the obese group ( = 0.57).
LVA is a feasible procedure even in morbidly obese patients. Considering that substantial weight loss is a difficult and time-consuming task for patients, LVA combined with not gaining weight is a good option for these patients.
尽管肥胖所致淋巴水肿患者可通过减肥疗法进行治疗,但他们发现难以减掉所需的体重。本研究的目的是阐明肥胖所致淋巴水肿患者淋巴管的特征,并确定这些患者进行淋巴管静脉吻合术(LVA)的可行性和疗效。
将22例体重指数(BMI)>35 kg/m²的患者(44条水肿下肢)(肥胖组)和91例淋巴水肿患者(141条水肿下肢)且BMI<25 kg/m²作为对照组(非肥胖组)纳入研究并接受LVA。比较淋巴管的直径和深度以及LVA的效果。
非肥胖组和肥胖组在10毫米深度内均可检测到淋巴管(分别为3.0±1.4毫米和3.5±2.1毫米;P<0.01)。肥胖组的淋巴管直径显著大于非肥胖组(分别为0.79±0.30毫米和0.54±0.22毫米;P<0.01)。非肥胖组(9.1%±9.2%)和肥胖组(8.9%±7.3%;P=0.84)LVA后淋巴水肿改善率无显著差异。肥胖组中淋巴水肿改善率与BMI改善率之间无相关性(P=0.57)。
即使对于病态肥胖患者,LVA也是一种可行的手术。考虑到大幅减重对患者来说是一项困难且耗时的任务,LVA联合不增重对这些患者来说是一个不错的选择。