Suppr超能文献

长期口服β受体阻滞剂治疗对射血分数保留的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of Long-Term Oral Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

The Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

The Department of Medicine, The Section of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; and.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 1;77(1):87-93. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000922.

Abstract

After the results of the first multicenter, prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluating long-term efficacy of oral beta-blockers in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), we decided to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the long-term efficacy of oral beta-blocker use in patients with preserved LVEF who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI. A time-limited search from January 1, 1999, to April 16, 2020, on PubMed and EMBASE was conducted on April 16, 2020, for observational studies and clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of long-term oral beta-blockers in patients with preserved LVEF after STEMI treated with PCI. The comparative outcomes between beta-blockers and non-beta-blockers were assessed by pooling weighted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects model. The outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event (MACE). Twelve studies (11 observational and 1 RCT) comprising 32,108 patients (19,740 on beta-blocker therapy and 12,368 without beta-blocker therapy) were included. Of which, 75% percent were male (mean age of 64 years: 63.87 ± 3.01 years on beta-blocker therapy and 64.76 ± 3.02 years on non-beta-blocker therapy; P = 0.129) with a follow-up of up to 4.7 years. Unadjusted all-cause mortality [OR = 0.58 (95% CI: 0.42-0.79)] and adjusted all-cause mortality [OR = 0.64 (95% CI: 0.48-0.87)] were significantly lower in patients on the long-term beta-blocker therapy group. However, unadjusted MACE [OR = 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-1.08)] was not reduced with beta-blocker therapy in these patients. Patients with preserved LVEF after STEMI treated with PCI on long-term oral beta-blocker therapy have a significant reduction in risk of all-cause mortality, without an effect on MACE rates. The only RCT included showed neutral effect, so results of ongoing RCTs are anticipated. Considering that the only high-quality data (RCT) suggest a neutral effect, one should be cautious in interpreting the conclusion.

摘要

在第一项评估口服β受体阻滞剂对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留患者长期疗效的多中心前瞻性随机临床试验(RCT)结果公布后,我们决定进行一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估口服β受体阻滞剂在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 STEMI 后 LVEF 保留患者中的长期疗效。我们于 2020 年 4 月 16 日对 1999 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 4 月 16 日期间的 PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库进行了限时检索,以寻找评估长期口服β受体阻滞剂对 STEMI 后 LVEF 保留且接受 PCI 治疗的患者疗效的观察性研究和临床试验。我们通过随机效应模型,采用加权比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)来评估β受体阻滞剂和非β受体阻滞剂之间的比较结果。主要观察终点为全因死亡率和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。共纳入 12 项研究(11 项观察性研究和 1 项 RCT),包括 32108 例患者(β受体阻滞剂治疗组 19740 例,非β受体阻滞剂治疗组 12368 例)。其中,75%为男性(β受体阻滞剂治疗组平均年龄为 64 岁:63.87±3.01 岁,非β受体阻滞剂治疗组为 64.76±3.02 岁;P=0.129),随访时间最长达 4.7 年。未校正的全因死亡率[OR=0.58(95%CI:0.42-0.79)]和校正的全因死亡率[OR=0.64(95%CI:0.48-0.87)]在接受长期β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者中显著降低。然而,这些患者中β受体阻滞剂治疗并未降低未校正的 MACE 发生率[OR=0.87(95%CI:0.70-1.08)]。STEMI 后 LVEF 保留且接受长期口服β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者,全因死亡率风险显著降低,MACE 发生率无变化。唯一纳入的 RCT 显示中性效果,因此预计正在进行的 RCT 结果。鉴于唯一高质量数据(RCT)显示中性效果,在解释结论时应谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验