• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平价医疗法案对眼科保健和初级保健检查的利用效益的影响。

Impact of the affordable care act on utilization of benefits of eye care and primary care examinations.

机构信息

Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

SUNY College of Optometry, New York, NY, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0241475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241475. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0241475
PMID:33137130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7605705/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on utilization of benefits of both eye care and primary care examinations in individuals who did not have health insurance prior to the ACA.

METHODS

Patients examined in an urban eye clinic from 2017 to 2018 were invited to participate. Patients were classified into two groups: Insured Group, who had health insurance before and after the ACA; The ACA Group, who had insurance only after the ACA. Patients were surveyed on how often they were examined by their eye care and primary care physicians before and after the ACA. The care utilization frequency was categorized into 3 levels: Frequent Care Use, Rare Care Use, and Never. To test the utilization of benefits frequency difference between two groups, the z-ratio was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 4,355 patients were enrolled with 87.1% in the Insured Group and 12.9% in the ACA Group. After the ACA implementation, the percentage of "Frequent Care Use" of the eye care and primary care in the ACA Group patients significantly increased from 31.2% and 53.7% to 57.9% and 74.9%, respectively (P<0.001), but were significantly lower than those in the Insured Group (76.6% and 93.9%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ACA significantly improved utilization of benefits of eye care and primary care for individuals in the ACA Group. Although improved, those patients who received health insurance through the ACA still had lower utilization of benefits than those in the Insured Group.

摘要

目的

确定《平价医疗法案》(ACA)对在该法案实施前没有医疗保险的个人的眼科保健和初级保健检查的福利利用的影响。

方法

邀请在城市眼科诊所接受检查的患者参加。患者分为两组:有保险组,在 ACA 前后都有医疗保险;ACA 组,仅在 ACA 后才有保险。对患者进行调查,询问他们在 ACA 前后多久接受一次眼科医生和初级保健医生的检查。将护理利用频率分为 3 个等级:频繁护理使用、罕见护理使用和从不使用。为了测试两组之间福利利用频率的差异,计算了 z 比。

结果

共纳入 4355 例患者,其中 87.1%为有保险组,12.9%为 ACA 组。ACA 实施后,ACA 组患者的眼科和初级保健的“频繁护理使用”比例分别从 31.2%和 53.7%显著增加到 57.9%和 74.9%(P<0.001),但显著低于有保险组(76.6%和 93.9%,P<0.001)。

结论

ACA 显著改善了 ACA 组个人的眼科保健和初级保健的福利利用。尽管有所改善,但那些通过 ACA 获得医疗保险的患者的福利利用率仍低于有保险组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9777/7605705/1a807a866426/pone.0241475.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9777/7605705/1a807a866426/pone.0241475.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9777/7605705/1a807a866426/pone.0241475.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of the affordable care act on utilization of benefits of eye care and primary care examinations.平价医疗法案对眼科保健和初级保健检查的利用效益的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0241475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241475. eCollection 2020.
2
The Affordable Care Act Decreased the Proportion of Uninsured Patients in a Safety Net Orthopaedic Clinic.平价医疗法案降低了一家骨科医保诊所中无保险患者的比例。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 May;476(5):925-931. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000078.
3
Early impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on insurance among young adults with cancer: Analysis of the dependent insurance provision.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》对患癌青年成年人保险的早期影响:受抚养人保险条款分析
Cancer. 2016 Jun 1;122(11):1766-73. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29982. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
4
A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care or Insurance for Many and Coverage for Few?对奥巴马医改的批判性分析:是可承受的医疗保健,还是惠及多数人的保险和少数人的覆盖范围?
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):111-138.
5
Why Uninsured Free Clinic Patients Don't Apply for Affordable Care Act Health Insurance in a Non-expanding Medicaid State.为何在非医疗补助扩大州,未参保的免费诊所患者不申请《平价医疗法案》医保。
J Community Health. 2016 Feb;41(1):119-26. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0076-3.
6
Breast Screening Utilization and Cost Sharing Among Employed Insured Women After the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案》实施后,有保险的就业女性的乳房 X 光筛查利用率和费用分担情况。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Jun;16(6):788-796. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.028. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
7
Risk Factors for Visual Impairment in an Uninsured Population and the Impact of the Affordable Care Act.未参保人群视力损害的风险因素及《平价医疗法案》的影响
Clin Surg. 2016;1. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
8
Impact of Affordable Care Act coverage expansion on women's reproductive preventive services in the United States.《平价医疗法案》覆盖范围扩大对美国女性生殖预防服务的影响
Prev Med. 2016 Aug;89:224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 May 25.
9
Up-to-Date on Preventive Care Services Under Affordable Care Act: A Trend Analysis From MEPS 2007-2014.《平价医疗法案》下预防性医疗服务的最新情况:2007 - 2014年医疗支出面板调查的趋势分析
Med Care. 2017 Aug;55(8):771-780. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000763.
10
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on the Receipt of Colonoscopies among the Insured Elderly.平价医疗法案对参保老年人接受结肠镜检查的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 2;17(1):313. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010313.

引用本文的文献

1
Telehealth Encourages Patients with Diabetes in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups to Return for in-Person Ophthalmic Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.远程医疗鼓励种族和少数民族群体中的糖尿病患者在新冠疫情期间返回接受面对面眼科护理。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 4;16:2157-2166. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S368972. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Vision Loss With Hospital Use and Costs Among Older Adults.老年人视力丧失与医院使用和费用的关联。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 1;137(6):634-640. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0446.
2
Emergency Department Use across 88 Small Areas after Affordable Care Act Implementation in Illinois.伊利诺伊州实施《平价医疗法案》后88个小区域的急诊科使用情况
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):811-820. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.34007. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
3
A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care or Insurance for Many and Coverage for Few?
对奥巴马医改的批判性分析:是可承受的医疗保健,还是惠及多数人的保险和少数人的覆盖范围?
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):111-138.
4
Evolution of US Health Care Reform.美国医疗保健改革的演变
Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):107-110.
5
Surveillance for Health Care Access and Health Services Use, Adults Aged 18-64 Years - Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2014.18-64岁成年人医疗保健可及性与医疗服务利用情况监测——美国行为危险因素监测系统,2014年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 24;66(7):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6607a1.
6
Repealing the ACA without a Replacement - The Risks to American Health Care.在没有替代方案的情况下废除《平价医疗法案》——对美国医疗保健的风险。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 26;376(4):297-299. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1616577. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
Increased Emergency Department Use in Illinois After Implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》实施后伊利诺伊州急诊科使用量增加
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;69(2):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.06.026. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
United States Health Care Reform: Progress to Date and Next Steps.美国医疗保健改革:迄今取得的进展及后续步骤。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):525-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9797.
9
Effect of the Affordable Care Act on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Insurance Coverage.《平价医疗法案》对医疗保险覆盖范围中种族和族裔差异的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Aug;106(8):1416-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303155. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
The Association of Health-Related Quality of Life with Severity of Visual Impairment among People Aged 40-64 Years: Findings from the 2006-2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.40至64岁人群中与视力损害严重程度相关的健康相关生活质量:2006 - 2010年行为危险因素监测系统的调查结果
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;23(3):145-53. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2016.1168851. Epub 2016 May 9.