Emergency Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Oct 29;56(11):572. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110572.
urinary antigen (u-Ag) testing has recently gained attention in the early diagnosis of severe and critical acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2/pneumococcal co-infection. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of u-Ag testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, in order to assess whether pneumococcal co-infection is associated with different mortality rate and hospital stay in these patients.
Charts, protocols, mortality, and hospitalization data of a consecutive series of COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in northern Italy during COVID-19 outbreak were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent u-Ag testing to detect an underlying pneumococcal co-infection. Covid19+/u-Ag+ and Covid19+/u-Ag- patients were compared in terms of overall survival and length of hospital stay using chi-square test and survival analysis.
Out of 575 patients with documented pneumonia, 13% screened positive for the u-Ag test. All u-Ag+ patients underwent treatment with Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin or Levofloxacin. Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Darunavir/Cobicistat were added in 44 patients, and hydroxychloroquine and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in 47 and 33 patients, respectively. All u-Ag+ patients were hospitalized. Mortality was 15.4% and 25.9% in u-Ag+ and u-Ag- patients, respectively ( = 0.09). Survival analysis showed a better prognosis, albeit not significant, in u-Ag+ patients. Median hospital stay did not differ among groups (10 vs. 9 days, = 0.71).
The routine use of Streptococcus pneumoniae u-Ag testing helped to better target antibiotic therapy with a final trend of reduction in mortality of u-Ag+ COVID-19 patients having a concomitant pneumococcal infection. Randomized trials on larger cohorts are necessary in order to draw definitive conclusion.
尿液抗原(u-Ag)检测最近在严重和危急的新型冠状病毒/肺炎链球菌合并感染的早期诊断中受到关注。本研究旨在评估 u-Ag 检测在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者中的有效性,以评估肺炎链球菌合并感染是否与这些患者的不同死亡率和住院时间相关。
回顾性分析了意大利北部一家三级医院 COVID-19 爆发期间连续系列 COVID-19 患者的图表、方案、死亡率和住院数据。所有患者均接受 u-Ag 检测以检测潜在的肺炎链球菌合并感染。使用卡方检验和生存分析比较了 COVID-19+/u-Ag+和 COVID-19+/u-Ag-患者的总生存率和住院时间。
在有记录的肺炎患者中,13%的患者 u-Ag 检测呈阳性。所有 u-Ag+患者均接受头孢曲松和阿奇霉素或左氧氟沙星治疗。44 例患者加用洛匹那韦/利托那韦或达芦那韦/考比司他,47 例和 33 例患者分别加用羟氯喹和低分子肝素(LMWH)。所有 u-Ag+患者均住院治疗。u-Ag+和 u-Ag-患者的死亡率分别为 15.4%和 25.9%( = 0.09)。生存分析显示 u-Ag+患者的预后较好,但无统计学意义。各组的中位住院时间无差异(10 天 vs. 9 天, = 0.71)。
常规使用肺炎链球菌 u-Ag 检测有助于更好地靶向抗生素治疗,最终趋势是降低同时患有肺炎链球菌感染的 COVID-19 患者的死亡率。需要进行更大样本量的随机试验以得出明确的结论。