Ipema Jetty, Welling Rutger H A, Bakker Olaf J, Bokkers Reinoud P H, de Vries Jean-Paul P M, Ünlü Çagdas
Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Wilhelminalaan 12, 1815 JD Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 30;9(11):3515. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113515.
After infrainguinal endovascular treatment for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), it is uncertain whether single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) should be preferred. This study investigated major adverse limb events (MALE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between patients receiving SAPT and DAPT. Patient data from three centers in the Netherlands were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All patients treated for PAD by endovascular revascularization of the superficial femoral, popliteal, or below-the-knee (BTK) arteries and who were prescribed acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel, were included. End points were 1-, 3-, and 12-month MALE and MACE, and bleeding complications. In total, 237 patients (258 limbs treated) were included, with 149 patients receiving SAPT (63%) and 88 DAPT (37%). No significant differences were found after univariate and multivariate analyses between SAPT and DAPT on 1-, 3-, and 12-month MALE and MACE, or bleeding outcomes. Subgroup analyses of patients with BTK treatment showed a significantly lower 12-month MALE rate when treated with DAPT (hazard ratio 0.33; 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.95; = 0.04). In conclusion, although patient numbers were small, no differences were found between SAPT and DAPT regarding MALE, MACE, or bleeding complications. DAPT should, however, be considered over SAPT for the subgroup of patients with below-the-knee endovascular treatment.
在对周围动脉疾病(PAD)进行股下血管腔内治疗后,单药抗血小板治疗(SAPT)还是双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)更优尚无定论。本研究调查了接受SAPT和DAPT的患者的主要肢体不良事件(MALE)和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。对来自荷兰三个中心的患者数据进行了回顾性收集和分析。纳入所有通过股浅动脉、腘动脉或膝下(BTK)动脉血管腔内血运重建治疗PAD且处方了乙酰水杨酸或氯吡格雷的患者。终点指标为1个月、3个月和12个月时的MALE、MACE以及出血并发症。总共纳入了237例患者(治疗了258条肢体),其中149例患者接受SAPT(63%),88例接受DAPT(37%)。单因素和多因素分析显示,SAPT和DAPT在1个月、3个月和12个月时的MALE、MACE或出血结局方面无显著差异。BTK治疗患者的亚组分析显示,接受DAPT治疗时12个月的MALE发生率显著更低(风险比0.33;95%置信区间0.12 - 0.95;P = 0.04)。总之,尽管患者数量较少,但在MALE、MACE或出血并发症方面,SAPT和DAPT之间未发现差异。然而,对于膝下血管腔内治疗的患者亚组,应考虑使用DAPT而非SAPT。