Trnka Susanna
Anthropol Today. 2020 Oct;36(5):11-13. doi: 10.1111/1467-8322.12603. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Scholarly examinations of states of emergency frequently underscore how the crisis imaginary is employed to rapidly and unjustifiably expand state power. This line of analysis affords great insight into the misuse of state power. It also, however, tends to depict the citizenry as either weak and overwhelmed or at best, duped by the workings of the state, and thus ignores the possibility of democratic processes continuing within a state of emergency. Aotearoa/New Zealand's response to Covid-19 reveals a collaborative dynamic in which the citizenry actively engaged in constituting the state of emergency, and suggests the need for a broader examination of how collective responsibility, care and blame are envisioned and enacted, not only by governments but by (neo-liberal) citizenries during times of national crisis.
对紧急状态的学术研究常常强调,危机想象是如何被用来迅速且不合理地扩大国家权力的。这一分析思路为国家权力的滥用提供了深刻见解。然而,它也倾向于将公民描绘成要么软弱无力、不堪重负,要么充其量是被国家运作所欺骗,从而忽视了在紧急状态下民主进程仍在继续的可能性。新西兰对新冠疫情的应对揭示了一种协作动态,即公民积极参与构建紧急状态,并表明有必要更广泛地审视集体责任、关怀和指责是如何被设想和践行的,不仅是政府,还有(新自由主义的)公民在国家危机时期的表现。