• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烧伤患者预后模型的比较:一项回顾性全国登记研究。

Comparison of prognostic models for burn patients: A retrospective nationwide registry study.

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan; Department of Emergency and Acute Medicine, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan; Division of Traumatology, Research Institute, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

Burns. 2020 Dec;46(8):1746-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.008
PMID:33148486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prognostic burn index (PBI) is a unique model utilized to predict mortality of burn patients in Japan. In contrast, other prediction models are rarely used in Japan, and their accuracy and predictive value are unknown. The present study aimed to compare commonly used burn prediction models and determine the appropriate model for mortality prediction in Japanese burn patients.

METHODS

Japanese burn patients registered in the nationwide burn registry of Japanese Society for Burn Injury between April 1, 2011 and March 31, 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The prognostic performance of PBI was compared with Baux score, revised Baux score, abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI), Ryan score and Belgian outcome in burn injury score (BOBI). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 7911 acute burn patients. The overall mortality rate was 10.7%, the median age was 52 (interquartile range, 26-72) years, and the median % total body surface area was 7% (interquartile range, 3%-17%). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for PBI, Baux score, ABSI, revised Baux score, Ryan score, and BOBI were 0.940 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.931-0.948), 0.943 (95% CI: 0.934-0.951; p=0.002), 0.945 (95% CI: 0.937-0.953; p=0.058), 0.946 (95% CI: 0.937-0.953; p=0.002), 0.859 (95% CI: 0.846-0.870; p<0.001), and 0.896 (95% CI: 0.885-0.905; p<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although the performance of PBI was good, it was not superior to the Baux score, revised Baux score, and ABSI. These three scores have a high prognostic accuracy. Hence, they are considered as alternative burn prognostic scores in Japan. The Baux score was an optimal prognostic model for patients with burns in Japan.

摘要

背景

预后烧伤指数(PBI)是一种用于预测日本烧伤患者死亡率的独特模型。相比之下,日本很少使用其他预测模型,其准确性和预测价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较常用的烧伤预测模型,并确定适合日本烧伤患者死亡率预测的模型。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 4 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日期间在日本烧伤学会全国烧伤登记处登记的日本烧伤患者。比较 PBI 与 Baux 评分、改良 Baux 评分、简化烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)、Ryan 评分和比利时烧伤结局评分(BOBI)的预后性能。主要结局是院内死亡率。

结果

本研究纳入 7911 例急性烧伤患者。总死亡率为 10.7%,中位年龄为 52 岁(四分位距 26-72 岁),中位%总体表面积为 7%(四分位距 3%-17%)。PBI、Baux 评分、ABSI、改良 Baux 评分、Ryan 评分和 BOBI 的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.940(95%置信区间:0.931-0.948)、0.943(95%置信区间:0.934-0.951;p=0.002)、0.945(95%置信区间:0.937-0.953;p=0.058)、0.946(95%置信区间:0.937-0.953;p=0.002)、0.859(95%置信区间:0.846-0.870;p<0.001)和 0.896(95%置信区间:0.885-0.905;p<0.001)。

结论

尽管 PBI 表现良好,但并不优于 Baux 评分、改良 Baux 评分和 ABSI。这三个评分具有较高的预后准确性。因此,它们被认为是日本替代烧伤预后评分。Baux 评分是日本烧伤患者的最佳预后模型。

相似文献

1
Comparison of prognostic models for burn patients: A retrospective nationwide registry study.烧伤患者预后模型的比较:一项回顾性全国登记研究。
Burns. 2020 Dec;46(8):1746-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
2
Predictors of mortality and validation of burn mortality prognostic scores in a Malaysian burns intensive care unit.马来西亚烧伤重症监护病房死亡率的预测因素及烧伤死亡率预后评分的验证
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 7;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0284-8.
3
Revised Baux Score and updated Charlson comorbidity index are independently associated with mortality in burns intensive care patients.修订后的 Baux 评分和更新后的 Charlson 合并症指数与烧伤重症监护患者的死亡率独立相关。
Burns. 2015 Nov;41(7):1420-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
4
Accuracy of commercial reporting systems to monitor quality of care in burns.用于监测烧伤护理质量的商业报告系统的准确性。
Burns. 2014 Mar;40(2):251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
5
Comparison of mortality prediction models and validation of SAPS II in critically ill burns patients.危重症烧伤患者死亡率预测模型的比较及序贯器官衰竭评估Ⅱ(SAPS II)的验证
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2016 Jun 30;29(2):123-129.
6
Comparative Analysis of Composite Mortality Prediction Scores in Intensive Care Burn Patients.重症烧伤患者复合死亡率预测评分的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912321.
7
Evaluation of clinical outcomes and comparison of prediction models in the burn population hospitalized from the emergency department: Can burn mortality scores be used in a post-conflict area such as northwest Syria?评估烧伤人群在急诊科住院的临床结局和预测模型的比较:烧伤死亡率评分是否可用于类似叙利亚西北部这样的冲突后地区?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Mar;29(3):409-418. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.17731.
8
[Comparative study of three scores in predicting the death risk of severe burn patients].[三种评分系统预测严重烧伤患者死亡风险的比较研究]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 20;38(2):184-189. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201113-00473.
9
External validation of the revised Baux score for the prediction of mortality in patients with acute burn injury.修订后的 Baux 评分对预测急性烧伤患者死亡率的外部验证。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):840-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000124.
10
Burn Mortality in an Appalachian Referral Center: An Examination of Mortality Prediction Scores in a 13-Year Retrospective Study.阿巴拉契亚转诊中心的烧伤死亡率:一项为期13年的回顾性研究中的死亡率预测评分分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 22;16(6):e62912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62912. eCollection 2024 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of severe burns in adults: A retrospective study at a burn centre in Suzhou, China.成人重度烧伤的流行病学和临床特征:中国苏州一家烧伤中心的回顾性研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 Dec;21(12):e70097. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70097.
2
Burn Mortality in an Appalachian Referral Center: An Examination of Mortality Prediction Scores in a 13-Year Retrospective Study.阿巴拉契亚转诊中心的烧伤死亡率:一项为期13年的回顾性研究中的死亡率预测评分分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 22;16(6):e62912. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62912. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Risk Models to Predict Mortality in Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
预测烧伤患者死亡率的风险模型:系统评价与荟萃分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Dec 16;10(12):e4694. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004694. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Machine learning links different gene patterns of viral infection to immunosuppression and immune-related biomarkers in severe burns.机器学习将病毒感染的不同基因模式与严重烧伤的免疫抑制和免疫相关生物标志物联系起来。
Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 28;13:1054407. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1054407. eCollection 2022.
5
[Comparative study of three scores in predicting the death risk of severe burn patients].[三种评分系统预测严重烧伤患者死亡风险的比较研究]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 20;38(2):184-189. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20201113-00473.
6
A proof-of-concept study on mortality prediction with machine learning algorithms using burn intensive care data.一项利用烧伤重症监护数据通过机器学习算法进行死亡率预测的概念验证研究。
Scars Burn Heal. 2022 Feb 18;8:20595131211066585. doi: 10.1177/20595131211066585. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.